Advertisement

Bangladesh: From an Electoral Democracy to a Hybrid Regime (1991–2018)

  • Ali RiazEmail author
Chapter
  • 132 Downloads
Part of the Politics of South Asia book series (POSAS)

Abstract

The democratization process in Bangladesh began in 1991, after two decades of civilian and military authoritarian rule. Various features of an electoral democracy became the hallmarks at the auspicious beginning. However, within the following two decades, the quality of democracy deteriorated, and the country became an electoral authoritarianism, a variant of the hybrid regime. A manipulated general election in 2014, boycotted by all parties, paved the way for a reversal of democracy. This chapter discusses the political developments between 1991 and 2018, the backsliding of democracy, and the progressive attenuation of inclusive governance as a background to the 2018 election.

Keywords

Electoral democracy Competitive authoritarianism Electoral authoritarianism Caretaker government Violence 

Bibliography

  1. Ahmed, Farid. 2014. Bangladesh ruling party wins elections marred by boycott, violence. January 06. Accessed December 6, 2018. https://www.cnn.com/2014/01/06/world/asia/bangladesh-elections/index.html.
  2. Amundsen, Inge. 2016. “Democratic dynasties? Internal party democracy in Bangladesh.” Party Politics 22 (1): 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman, David. 2018. Bangladesh: Ex-chief justice alleges he was ‘forced’ to resign. September 28. Accessed December 1, 2018. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/09/bangladesh-chief-justice-alleges-forced-resign-180927103453932.html.
  4. Brown, Trevor L., and Charles R. Wise. 2004. “Constitutional Courts and Legislative-Executive Relations: The Case of Ukraine.” Political Science Quarterly 119 (1): 143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dhaka Tribune. 2017. Sinha resigns as chief justice. November 11. Accessed December 26, 2019. https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2017/11/11/chief-justice-sk-sinha-resigns/.
  6. Ekman, Joakim. 2009. “Political Participation and Regime Stability: A Framework for Analyzing Hybrid Regimes.” International Political Science Review 30 (1): 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freedom House. 2012. Methodology. Accessed January 17, 2019. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2012/methodology.
  8. Hassan, Mirza. 2013. Political settlement dynamics in a limited-access order: The case of Bangladesh. Working Paper, Manchester: ESID, 62. http://www.effective-states.org/wp-content/uploads/working_papers/final-pdfs/esid_wp_23_hassan.pdf.
  9. Islam, Mohammad Mozahidul. 2013. “The Toxic Politics of Bangladesh: A Bipolar Competitive Neopatrimonial State.” Asian Journal of Political Science 21 (2): 148–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kilinc, Faith Resul. 2017. What we see in Venezuela is the faith of hybrid regimes. August 27. Accessed December 10, 2018. http://foreignpolicynews.org/2017/08/28/see-venezuela-faith-hybrid-regimes/.
  11. Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. 2002. “Elections without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Molla, Gyasuddin. 2000. Democratic Institution Building Process in Bangladesh: South Asian Experience of a New Model of a ‘Care-taker Government’ in a Parliamentary Framework. Working Paper, Department of Political Science, South Asia Institute, Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg, 15.Google Scholar
  13. Ottaway, Marina. 2003. Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  14. Riaz, Ali. 2014a. “A Crisis of Democracy in Bangladesh.” Current History 113 (762): 150–156.Google Scholar
  15. Riaz, Ali. 2016. Bangladesh: A Political History. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  16. Riaz, Ali. 2014b. “Bangladesh’s Failed Election.” Journal of Democracy 25 (2): 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Riaz, Ali. 2010. “‘Dynastic Politics’ and the Political Culture of Bangladesh.” Journal of International Relations 8 (2).Google Scholar
  18. Riaz, Ali. 2015. The Troubled Democracy of Bangladesh: ‘Muddling Through’ or ‘a Political Settlement’? Special Report, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore, Heng Mui Keng Terrace: Institute of South Asian Studies, 17.Google Scholar
  19. Schaffer, Howard B. 2002. “Back and Forth in Bangladesh.” Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schedler, Andreas. 2006. “The Logic of Electoral Authoritariansim.” In Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, by Andreas Schedler (ed.), 1–24. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner.Google Scholar
  21. Sobhan, Zafar. 2015. There can be only one. January 01. Accessed June 2, 2018. https://www.dhakatribune.com/uncategorized/2015/01/01/there-can-be-only-one.
  22. Strategic Forecast. 2016. Bangladesh’s Descent Into Authoritarianism. May 31. Accessed July 12, 2018. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/bangladeshs-descent-authoritarianism.
  23. The Daily Star. 2018a. August 21 attack: ‘State-backed crime’ punished. October 11. Accessed January 7, 2019. https://www.thedailystar.net/august-21-carnage/21-august-grenade-attack-verdict-tarique-rahman-awarded-life-1645090.
  24. The Daily Star. 2018b. Lower courts’ freedom undermined by 3 rules. January 02. Accessed December 27, 2018. https://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/lower-courts-freedom-undermined-3-rules-1513600.
  25. Urribarri, Raul A. Sanchez. 2011. “Courts between Democracy and Hybrid Authoritarianism: Evidence from the Venezuelan Supreme Court.” Law and Social Inquiry 36 (4): 854–884.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics and GovernmentIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations