Advertisement

Do Issues Matter? Law and Order in the 2002 French Presidential Election

  • Nonna Mayer
  • Vincent Tiberj
Chapter
Part of the French Politics, Society and Culture Series book series (FPSC)

Abstract

A large body of literature explains the growing electoral volatility in Western democracies by the decline of “cleavage voting” and the rise of “issue voting” Franklin et al., 1992. Citizens are supposed to become more autonomous and more critical of political elites because they are more educated, more exposed to information and more influenced by post-materialist values Nye et al., 1997; Norris, 1999. They would tend to vote less according to their party identification and their class or religious affiliations, but they would be more responsive to the political supply and the issues at stake. The last French presidential and parliamentary elections offer a good opportunity to explore such trends, with the help of the “2002 French Electoral Panel” survey data. Ten thousand interviews were conducted in three waves, on national samples representative of the French registered voters, before the first round of the presidential election, after the second presidential round and after the parliamentary second round.1

Keywords

Social Inequality Presidential Election Party Identification Extreme Left Retirement Fund 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boy (Daniel) and Chiche (Jean), “Les enjeux de l’élection”, pp. 219–238 in Boy (Daniel), Mayer (Nonna) eds, L’électeur a ses raisons (Paris: Presses de la FNSP, 1997).Google Scholar
  2. Boy (Daniel) and Mayer (Nonna) eds, L’électeur a ses raisons (Paris: Presses de la FNSP, 1997).Google Scholar
  3. Carmines (Ted) and Stimson, James A., Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  4. Franklin (Mark), Mackie (Tom) and Valen (Henry) et al., Electoral Change: Response to Evolving Social and Attitudinaal Structures in Western Countries (Cambridge: Cambridge university Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  5. Lewis-Beck (Michael), “Le vote du porte-monnaie en question”, pp. 239–262 in Boy Daniel, Mayer (Nonna) eds, L’électeur a ses raisons (Paris: Presses de la FNSP, 1997).Google Scholar
  6. Mayer (Nonna), Ces Français qui votent Le Pen Paris: Flammarion, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. Norris (Pippa) ed., Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  8. Nye (Joseph, S.), Zelikow (P.D.), King (D.C.) eds, Why People don’t Trust Government (Cambridge (Mass.), London: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  9. Tiberj (Vincent), Le choix d’un président, les modes d’évaluation des électeurs français (1995) et américains (1996) (Ph.D. Dissertation in Political Science, July 2002, Institute for Political Studies, Paris).Google Scholar
  10. Tiberj (Vincent), “Vote et insécurité”, unpublished report (Paris: CEVIPOF, 2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nonna Mayer
  • Vincent Tiberj

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations