Novel Minds pp 92-115 | Cite as

Shaftesbury: Conversation and the Psychology of Romance

  • Rebecca Tierney-Hynes
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print book series (PERCP)


Isabel Rivers observes that, in contrast to the empirical or revelation-based tendencies of late seventeenth-century moral philosophy, ‘[t]he basis of Shaftesbury’s epistemology is psychological’.1 That Shaftesbury is principally a social psychologist, or an anatomist of the mind, in his own terminology,2 is perhaps clearest in the Soliloquy; or, Advice to an Author, the treatise in his collection Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times (1711) that deals most obviously with the interior life. Shaftesbury declares ‘Authors at large’ to be ‘professed masters of understanding to the age’ (70). This unsurprising declaration of the social function of authorship, however, is qualified by his emphasis on soliloquy — the ability to ‘hold [ones]sel[f] in talk’ (77). Moreover, ‘great wits’, he says, are noted for their ‘great loquacity by themselves and their profound taciturnity in company’ (73), an odd statement for a man who was, first and foremost, a theorist of sociability.


Eighteenth Century Socratic Dialogue Early Eighteenth Dialogue Form Late Seventeenth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 4.
    John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Peter H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon, 1975), I.ii.15: 55.Google Scholar
  2. 19.
    Aphra Behn, Love-Letters Between a Nobleman and His Sister, ed. Janet Todd (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1996), 193–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rebecca Tierney-Hynes 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca Tierney-Hynes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations