Advertisement

Rent Growth Control and the Transition of Land to Urban Use

  • Alastair McFarlane
Chapter
  • 83 Downloads
Part of the Applied Econometrics Association Series book series (AEAS)

Abstract

The notion that a rigid price-ceiling discourages investment in rental housing has led to the introduction of more flexible rent controls over the past few decades. What distinguishes this ‘second generation’ of rent regulations is that the upward adjustment of rents is allowed to account for inflation and other costs of holding residential real estate. Another characteristic that is common among these dynamically oriented rent controls is that the initial contract rent is not subject to regulation. It is only the growth of rents that is regulated. Yet, in much of economic theory, the static rent ceiling is still used as a benchmark case. Arnott (1995) has called for additional conceptual work to fill this void. It is the purpose of this chapter to make a small contribution to the understanding of how the construction of urban housing may be affected by a flexible rent ceiling.

Keywords

Real Interest Rate Central Business District Market Rent Vacant Land Rent Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.E. (1986), ‘Property Taxes and the Timing of Urban Land Development’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 16, 438–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnott, R. (1995), ‘Time for Revisionism in Rent Control?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu, K. and P. Emerson (2000), ‘The Economics of Tenancy Rent Control’, Economic Journal, 110, 939–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brueckner, J. (2000), ‘Urban Growth Models with Durable Housing: An Overview’, in J.M. Huriot and J.-P. Thisse (eds), Economies of Cities: Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, 263–89.Google Scholar
  5. Capozza, D. and R. Helsley (1989), ‘The Fundamentals of Land Prices and Urban Growth’, Journal of Urban Economics, 26, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capozza, D. and R. Helsley (1990), ‘The Stochastic City’, Journal of Urban Economics, 28, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capozza, D. and Y. Li (2001), ‘Residential Investment and Interest Rates: An Empirical Test of Development as a Real Option’, Real Estate Economics, 29, 503–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Economic Commission (1991), Politique des loyers dans les pays de la CEE, Geneva, United Nations.Google Scholar
  9. Favarger, P. (1996), Logement, économie de marche et politique publique, Doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
  10. Favarger, P. and A. McFarlane (1996), ‘Aménagement du territoire et construction: l’outil fiscal’, in C. Jaccoud, M. Schuler and M. Bassand (eds), Raisons et déraisons de la ville: Approches du champ urbain, Lausanne, Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.Google Scholar
  11. Kutty, N. (1996), ‘The Impact of Rent Control on Housing Maintenance: A Dynamic Analysis Incorporating European and North American Regulations’, Journal of Housing Studies, 11, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lachat, D. and J. Micheli (1992), Le Nouveau Droit du Bail, ASLOCA, Lausanne.Google Scholar
  13. Lambelet, J.-C. and C. Zimmermann (1991), Droit au logement ou économie de marché? Une analyse de 1’immobilier Suisse, Lausanne, Editions Payot.Google Scholar
  14. Mayer, C. and T. Sommerville (2000), ‘Residential Construction: Using the Urban Growth Model to Estimate Housing Supply’, Journal of Urban Economics, 48(1), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McFarlane, A. (1997), ‘Timing of Land Development in the Presence of Rent Growth Control’, Final Proceedings of the 55th International Conference of the Applied Econometric Association, University of Neuchâtel, 83–8.Google Scholar
  16. McFarlane, A. (1999), ‘Taxes, Fees and Development’, Journal of Urban Economics, 46, 416–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McFarlane, A. (forthcoming), ‘Rent Stabilization and the Long-run Supply of Housing’, Regional Science and Urban Economics. Google Scholar
  18. Nagy, J. (1997), ‘Do Vacancy Decontrol Provisions Undo Rent Control?’, Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nilles, D. (1996), Faut-il libérer le loyers?, unpublished working paper, Department of Economics, University of Lausanne (December).Google Scholar
  20. Office federal du logement, Rapport de la commission d’étude loyer libre, Rapports du travail sur le logement, Cahier 28, Bern, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. Olsen, E. (1988), ‘What do Economists Know about the Effect of Rent Control on Housing Maintenance?’, Journal of Real Estate Economics and Finance, 1, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raess, P. and T. von Ungern-Sternberg (1999), ‘A Model of Regulation in the Housing Market’, Cahiers de recherches economiques 9903, Département d’économétrie et d’économie politique, University of Lausanne, February.Google Scholar
  23. Spiegel, M.R. (1990), Theory and Problems ofAdvanced Calculus, Schaums Outline Series, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. von Ungern-Sternberg, T. (1997), ‘Bases économiques pour une loi sur la protection des locataires’, Cahiers de recherches economiques, 9717, Département d’économétrie et d’économie politique, University of Lausanne, December.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Applied Econometrics Association 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alastair McFarlane

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations