Advertisement

The Wounded Body Politic

  • Sarah Covington
Chapter
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Images of bodily trauma suffused the political language of mid-seventeenth-century England, particularly when it came to describing a world fractured by civil war. Likened by royalists and parliamentarians to fallen nations such as the Israel of Isaiah or the Thebes of Oedipus, the state was imagined as a realm whose identity, once hedged by boundaries, had been irreparably breeched, leaving it in a state of bloody and defiled collapse. Abraham Cowley, a royalist, was one of the more vivid writers to describe how “England dyes us red in blood and blushes too”;1 such images were not simply metaphorical, however, but perceived as all too real. When writers referred to Charles I as “that man of blood,”2 for example, they really did mean that the king had wounded the nation by causing innocent blood to be spilled; by the same token, royalists, in addition to describing a land soaked in “Young Men’s Blood … and Mother’s Tears,” accused the regicides of literally breaking apart the seal of the corpus mysticum as well as the corpus materium, both of which constituted the very essence of the king (and relatedly, the kingdom).3

Keywords

Body Politic Political Language Divine Healing Biblical Language Rotten Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    William Allen, “A faithful Memorial of That Remarkable Meeting of Many Officers of the Army” (1659), in Somers Tracts, ed. Sir W. Scott (London, 1809–1815), 5: 501.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Patricia Crawford, “Charles Stuart, That Man of Blood,” Journal of British Studies 16 (1977), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    For the means by which metaphors persuade and shape attitudes, see Elliot Zashin and Phillip C. Chapman, “The Uses of Metaphor and Analogy: Toward a Renewal of Political Language,” in The Journal of Politics 36 (1974), 309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeremy Rayner, “Between Meaning and Event: An Historical Approach to Political Metaphors,” Political Studies 32 (1984), 537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eugene F. Miller, “Metaphor and Political Knowledge,” The American Political Science Review 73 (1974), 290–326Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Michael Walzer, “On the Role of Symbolism in Political Thought,” Political Science Quarterly 82 (1967), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 15.
    See, however, Conal Condren, “On Rhetorical Foundations of Leviathan,” History of Political Thought 11 (1990), 715.Google Scholar
  8. 21.
    J. G. A. Pocock, Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History 13 (1989), 13.Google Scholar
  9. 36.
    Zvi Jagendorf, “Coriolanus: Body Politic and Private Parts,” Shakespeare Quarterly 41 (1990), 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 37.
    See David Hale, “Coriolanus: The Death of a Political Metaphor,” Shakespeare Quarterly, 197-202; Hale, The Body Politic, 96-107; Tetsuya Motohashi, “Body Politic and Political Body in Coriolanus,” Forum for Modern Language Studies 30 (1994), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 38.
    Louise Olga Fradenburg, City, Marriage, Tournament: Arts of Rule in Late Medieval Scotland (Madison: WI, 1991), esp. 142, 242.Google Scholar
  12. 41.
    James Daly, “Cosmic Harmony and Political Thinking in Early Stuart England,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 69 (1979), 37–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 49.
    Quoted in John Forster, Sir John Eliot: A Biography, 1590–1632 (London, 1864), 1: 545, 549, 552.Google Scholar
  14. 59.
    John Milton, “The Second Defence of the English People,” in The Complete Prose Works of John Milton, ed. D. M. Wolfe (New Haven, 1953–1982), 4: 556.Google Scholar
  15. 61.
    John Milton, “The Reason of Church-Government,” in The Complete Prose Works of John Milton, ed. D. M. Wolfe (New Haven, 1953–1982), 1: 781.Google Scholar
  16. 62.
    John Milton, “Of Reformation Touching Church-Discipline in England,” in The Works of John Milton, ed. Frank Patterson (New York, 1931–1938), 3: 47–48.Google Scholar
  17. 63.
    For Milton’s “rhetorical iconoclasm,” see David Loewenstein, Milton and the Drama of History: Historical Vision, Iconoclasm, and the Literary Imagination (Cambridge, 1990), esp. 21-25; and Lana Cable, Carnal Rhetoric: Milton’s Iconoclasm and the Poetics of Desire (Durham: NC and London, 1995), 160, esp. 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 65.
    Robert Baillie, Letters and Journals: Containing an Impartial Account of Public Transactions, Civil, Ecclesiastical and Military in England and Scotland (Edinburgh, 1775), 1Google Scholar
  19. 67.
    Cuthbert Sydenham, The False Brother or, A New Map of Scotland Drawn... (1651), 4, 5–9.Google Scholar
  20. 72.
    See, for example, Ethan Shagan, “Constructing Discord: Ideology, Propaganda and the English Response to the Irish Rebellion of 1641,” Journal of British Studies 36 (1997), 4–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 78.
    Ethyn Williams Kirby, “Sermons before the Commons, 1640–42,” in The American Historical Review 3 (1939), 537.Google Scholar
  22. 84.
    Nicholas Lockyer, Balm for England: Or, Useful Instructions for Evil Times (rep. London, 1831), 4, 83–84ff.Google Scholar
  23. 106.
    See Kevin Sharpe, “ ‘So Hard a Text’: Images of Charles I, 1612–1700,” The Historical Journal 43 (2000), esp. 383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 128.
    Henry King, A Deep Groane, Fetch’d at the Funerall of the Incomparable and Glorious Monarch Charles the First (London, 1649), II, lines 9–10.Google Scholar
  25. 147.
    See for example Blair Worden, “The Politics of Marvell’s ‘Horatian Ode,’ “ Historical Journal 27 (1984), 525–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 157.
    Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. C. B. Macpherson (London, 1985), II, chap. 29, 375.Google Scholar
  27. 163.
    John Rogers, Mene, Tekel, Perez, or, A Little Appearance of the Handwriting... against the Powers and Apostates of the Times (London), 1654. See also C. H. Firth, The Last Years of the Protectorate, 1656–1658 (London, 1909), 1: 212.Google Scholar
  28. 166.
    Oliver Cromwell, Writings and Speeches, ed. W. C. Abbott (Oxford, 1937–1947), 3: 435.Google Scholar
  29. 169.
    Anon, Essayes upon Several Subjects not Unworthy [of] Consideration in These Times (1651), 8, 27.Google Scholar
  30. 171.
    See J. W. Daly, “John Bramhall and the Theoretical Problems of Royalist Moderation,” Journal of British Studies 11 (1971), 26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. John Sanderson, “Serpent-Salve, 1643: The Royalism of John Bramhall,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 25 (1974), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 177.
    Elizabeth Hedrick, “Romancing the Salve: Sir Kenelm Digby and the Powder of Sympathy,” British Journal for the History of Science 41 (2008), 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 186.
    J. Andrew Mendelsohn, “Alchemy and Politics in England, 1649–1665,” Past and Present 135 (1992), 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 188.
    Edward Hyde, The History of the Rebellion, ed. W. Dunn Macray (Oxford, 1979), 1: 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sarah Covington 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Covington

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations