The Lesions of Love

  • Sarah Covington


The symbolically rich imagery of wounds was fitting for descriptions of civil strife, legal crisis, or war, and therefore became something of a linguistic commonplace in various modes of mid-century writing. England was broken, its earth literally wounded, its soldiers injured, its identity reconfigured to a more fractured (if perhaps redeemable) condition. But on a more personal level, the image of woundedness could be applied no less fervently to what anthropologists call the “emotional universe” of the individual, with its myriad psychological conditions that threatened to disrupt that universe with their immoderate power.1 If personal identity was defined, like the state and the law, by its boundaries, then it could just as easily be upended by incursions on those boundaries. More precisely, it was a passion such as love, sorrow, jealousy, or hatred that internally and externally dealt such damage to the individual’s psychological integrity, as it “wounded” reason, “lashed” the conscience, or “broke” the heart of the individual relegated to a state of high, and fragile, extremity.


Animal Spirit Civil Strife Erotic Love Poetic Imagination Legal Crisis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Angus Gowland, “The Problem of Early Modern Melancholy,” Past and Present 191 (2006), 119–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 7.
    Steven Mullaney, “Mourning and Misogyny: Hamlet, The Revenger’s Tragedy, and the Final Progress of Elizabeth I,” Shakespeare Quarterly 45 (1994), 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 13.
    See, for example, Richard F. Hardin, “Ovid in Seventeenth-Century England,” Comparative Literature 24 (1972), 44–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 27.
    Jeremy Taylor, Holy Living and Dying Together with Prayers: Containing the Whole Duty (London, 1839), 188, 193.Google Scholar
  5. 39.
    See Victoria Kahn, “The Duty to Love: Passion and Obligation in Early Modern Political Theory,” Representations 68 (1999), 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 40.
    Quoted from Richard Hillyer, “Hobbes’s Explicated Fables and the Legacy of the Ancient,” Philosophy and Literature 28 (2004), 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 45.
    See G. F. Sensabaugh, “Platonic Love and the Puritan Rebellion,” Studies in Philology 37 (1940), 457–481.Google Scholar
  8. 47.
    For accounts of the 1643 attack on the chapel, see Margaret Aston, “Puritans and Iconoclasm, 1560-1660,” in The Culture of English Puritanism (London and New York, 1996), 113-121; Albert J. Loomie, “The Destruction of Rubens’s ‘Crucifixion’ in the Queen’s Chapel, Somerset House,” The Burlington Magazine 140 (1998), 680–682.Google Scholar
  9. 50.
    See, for example, Gerald Hammond, “Richard Lovelace and the Uses of Obscurity,” Chatterton Lecture on Poetry, 1985, Proceedings of the British Academy 71 (1985), 203–234.Google Scholar
  10. 51.
    Herrick, “To His Friend, on the Untunable Times,” in Poems of Robert Herrick, ed. Thomas Bailey Aldrich (London, 1900), 55. See also John L. Kimmey, “Robert Herrick’s Persona,” Studies in Philology 67 (1970), 221–236.Google Scholar
  11. 53.
    Quoted in Dolores Palomo, “The Halcyon Moment of Stillness in Royalist Poetry,” The Huntington Library Quarterly 44 (1981), 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 56.
    See, for example, John L. Kimmey, “Robert Herrick’s Persona.” Studies in Philology 67 (1970), 221–236.Google Scholar
  13. 58.
    Randy Robertson, “Lovelace and the ‘Barbed Censurers’: Lucasta and Civil War Censorship,” Studies in Philology 103 (2006), 471–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 60.
    John McWilliams, “‘A Storm of Lamentations Writ’: Lachrymae Musarum and Royalist Culture after the Civil War,” The Yearbook of English Studies 33 (2003), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 63.
    Robert Herrick, Hesperides, of the Works both Humane and Divine (Boston, 1856), 2: 219.Google Scholar
  16. 67.
    Earl Miner, “The Death of Innocence in Marvell’s Nymph Complaining for the Death of Her Fawn, Modern Philology 65 (1967), 9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Phoebe S. Spinrad, “Death, Loss, and Marvell’s Nymph,” PMLA 97 (1982), 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 86.
    For the trope of the unwanted heart, see Sylvia Ruffo-Fiore, “The Unwanted Heart in Petrarch and Donne,” Comparative Literature 24 (1971), 319, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 93.
    Robert Herrick, “Upon Love,” in Complete Poems (London, 1876), 3: 46Google Scholar
  20. 101.
    See, for example, Kenneth R. R. and Gros Louis, “The Triumph and Death of Orpheus in the English Renaissance,” Studies in English Literature 9 (1969), 63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Charles Martindale, “Paradise Metamorphosed: Ovid in Milton,” Comparative Literature 37 (1985), 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Caroline Mayerson, “The Orpheus Image in Lycidas,” PMLA 64 (1949), 189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 109.
    Angus Gowland, “The Problem of Early Modern Melancholy,” Past and Present 191 (2006), 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 111.
    See Douglas Trevor, “John Donne and Scholarly Melancholy,” in Studies in English Literature 40 (2000), 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 115.
    Thomas Watson, “The Tears of Fancie,” in Sydney Lee, ed. Elizabethan Sonnets (Westminster, 1904), I: 147.Google Scholar
  26. 121.
    See Jeremy Schmidt, “Melancholy and the Therapeutic Language of Moral Philosophy in Seventeenth-Century Thought,” Journal of the History of Ideas 65 (2004), 583–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 139.
    See Christopher Brunelle, “Form vs. Function in Ovid’s ‘Remedia Amoris,’” The Classical Journal 96 (2000), 126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sarah Covington 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Covington

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations