Advertisement

World Public Finance

  • Myron J. Frankman
Chapter
  • 9 Downloads
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

The next step in the reconstruction of our mental map of world order is that of considering the creation of a system of world public finance. The focus of world public finance would be to raise revenue to pay for the operations of the global public sector, including their activities in support of global public purposes, that is, those activities that are deemed to have global impact and which are not amenable to the actions of states, either acting alone or in groups. Included in these public purposes would be development financing, efforts on behalf of greater global equity, and the provision of global public goods. Each of these functions tends to be a subject of separate sets of discourse with limited overlap. I contend that the time has clearly come to talk about both world government and world public finance and to talk about both in terms that the urgency of our multiple, interconnected global crises requires, rather than the present financially and organizationally minimalist approach which often separates one need from another and then labors to earmark specific, often voluntary, revenues for unique purposes such as preventing the spread of AIDS. Our present problem-focused approach sometimes involves the creation of a new unit or a new international institution for a designated objective. Commonly the total resources—financial, human, and institutional—will not be increased but rather diverted from previous uses, as when foreign-aid funds were redirected after the fall of the Berlin Wall to the countries of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union from those in the global South.

Keywords

Public Good Gross Domestic Product Gini Coefficient Gross National Product Income Redistribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Douglas Dosser, ‘Towards a Theory of International Public Finance’, Kyklos, 16 (fasc. 1, 1963), pp. 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruben P. Mendez, International Public Finance: A New Perspective on Global Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Timothy Bainbridge, The Penguin Companion to European Union, 3rd edn (London: Penguin, 2002).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Paul Samuelson, ‘International Factor-Price Equalisation Once Again’, Economic Journal, 59 (1949), pp. 181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 6.
    Richard B. Freeman, ‘Are Your Wages Set in Beijing’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (1995), pp. 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    See, for example, David King, Fiscal Tiers: The Economics of Multi-Level Government (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1984);Google Scholar
  7. and Albert Breton and Anthony Scott, The Economic Constitution of Federal States (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richard A. Musgrave, ‘Theories of Fiscal Federalism’, Public Finance, 24 (1969), pp. 521–32.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marina von Neumann Whitman, cited in Charles P. Kindleberger, ‘Government and International Trade’, Essays in International Finance, 129 (July 1978), p. 1;Google Scholar
  10. and Kindleberger, ‘International Public Goods without International Government’, American Economic Review, 76 (March 1986), p. 5.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Ruben P. Mendez, ‘Global taxation: The Rise, Decline and Future of an Idea at the United Nations’ (Paris: Institut pour le développement durables et relations internationale, 2002), http://iddri.org/iddri/telecharge/fiscalite/mendez.pdf.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mark P. Hampton and John Cristensen, ‘Offshore Pariahs? Small Island Economies, Tax Havens, and the Reconfiguration of Global Finance’, World Development, 30 (2002), pp. 1657–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 16.
    Robert H. Frank and Philip J. Cook, The Winner-Take-All Society: How More and More Americans Compete for Ever Fewer and Bigger Prizes, Encouraging Economic Waste, Income Inequality, and an Impoverished Cultural Life (New York: Free Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    Thurman Arnold, The Folklore of Capitalism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962), p. xxvi.Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    Charles Jones, Global Justice: Defending Cosmopolitanism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  16. See also Darrel Moellendorf, Cosmopolitan Justice (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 1999 (HDR) (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 3.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Branko Milanovic, ‘True World Income Distribution, 1988 and 1993: First Calculations Based on Household Surveys Alone’, The Economic Journal, 112 (2002), pp. 51–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 23.
    Christopher Layton, ‘One Europe: One World; A First Exploration of Europe’s Potential Contribution to World Order’, Journal of World Trade Law, Special Supplement No. 4, 20 (1986), pp. 332–33.Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    Commission on International Development, Partners in Development (New York, Praeger, 1969). Commission chaired by Lester B. Pearson.Google Scholar
  21. 29.
    Sayre Schatz, ‘Socializing Adaptation: A Perspective on World Capitalism’, World Development, 11 (1983), pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 35.
    James Lorimer, ‘Book V. The Ultimate Problem of International Jurisprudence’, The Institutes of the Law of Nations: A Treatise of the Jural Relations of Separate Political Communities (Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood and Sons, 1884), II, p. 186.Google Scholar
  23. See also C. Wilfred Jenks, ‘The Significance Today of Lorimer’s Ultimate Problem of International Jurisprudence’, Transactions of the Grotius Society, 26 (1940), pp. 35–65.Google Scholar
  24. 37.
    Gunnar Myrdal, An International Economy: Problems and Prospects (New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1956), p. 324.Google Scholar
  25. 38.
    Gunnar Myrdal, The Challenge of World Poverty: A World Anti-Poverty Program in Outline (New York: Vintage Books, 1970), p. xv.Google Scholar
  26. 40.
    Grenville Clark and Louis B. Sohn, World Peace Through World Law (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
  27. 44.
    Commission to Study the Organization of Peace, Strengthening the United Nations (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1957),Google Scholar
  28. cited in John Stoessinger and Associates, Financing the United Nations System (Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1964), p. 266.Google Scholar
  29. 48.
    Jan Tinbergen, coordinator, Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1976), p. 217.Google Scholar
  30. For a discussion of the brain-drain tax, see Koichi Hamada, ‘Taxing the Brain Drain: A Global Point of View’, in Jagdish Bhagwati, ed., The New International Economic Order: The North–South Debate (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1977), pp. 125–55.Google Scholar
  31. My proposal for a 0.1 percent tax on international capital movements was solely intended as a revenue-raising measure and applies to a portion of the tax base covered by the Tobin Tax, first proposed in 1972. Myron J. Frankman, ‘Foreign Aid, World Government, and the Multi-National Corporation’, paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Economics Association (Winnipeg, 5 June 1970), p. 7.Google Scholar
  32. 49.
    Mahbub ul Haq, The Poverty Curtain: Choices for the Third World (New York: Columbia University Press, 1956), p. 196.Google Scholar
  33. 52.
    Eleanor Steinberg and Joseph A. Yager, with Gerard M. Brannon, New Means of Financing International Needs (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1978), p. 196.Google Scholar
  34. 54.
    Russell B. Sunshine and Javade Chaudhri, ‘Global Development Taxes: A Promising New Source of International Finance for Developing countries’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 19 (1981), pp. 407–53.Google Scholar
  35. 55.
    Independent Commission on International Development Issues, North-South: A Program for Survival (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1980), pp. 244–45. Commission chaired by Willy Brandt.Google Scholar
  36. 58.
    Inge Kaul, Isabel Grunberg, and Mark A. Stern, eds, Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  37. 59.
    Tobin gives an example of the effect of a 1 percent tax (1974, p. 89; 1978, p. 155). Later he explicitly called for a tax set at 0.5 percent (HDR 1994, p. 70). For a discussion of a tax rate which would automatically vary with short-term interest rate differentials see Thomas Dernburg, Global Macroeconomics (New York: Harper and Row, 1989), pp. 457–59.Google Scholar
  38. 63.
    Pablo Neruda, in James Cockroft and Dale L. Johnson, eds, The Chilean Road to Socialism (Garden City: Anchor Press, 1973), pp. 140–41.Google Scholar
  39. 64.
    William R. Cline, ‘Resource Transfers to the Developing Countries: Issues and Trends’, in Cline, ed., Policy Alternatives for a New International Order: An Economic Analysis (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1979), pp. 343–44.Google Scholar
  40. 65.
    Thorstein Veblen, The Vested Interests and the Common Man (New York: B.W. Huebsch, 1919).Google Scholar
  41. 69.
    Ruben Mendez, ‘The Provision and Financing of Universal Public Goods’, Global Governance: Ethics and Economics of the World Order. M. Desai and P. Redfern, eds (London: Pinter, 1995), pp. 39–59.Google Scholar
  42. See also, Ruben Mendez, ‘Peace as a Global Public Good’, in I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, and M.A. Stern, eds, Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 382–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 70.
    See, for example, Kaul, Grunberg, and Stern (1999); Francisco Sagasti and Keith Bezanson, Financing and Providing Global Public Goods: Expectations and Prospects (Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Institute of Development Studies, Sussex, 2001), http://www.ud.se/prefak/Document.jsp?DocumentID=43161;Google Scholar
  44. Ravi Kanbur, Todd Sandler, and Kevin Morrison, ‘The Future of Development Assistance: Common Pools and International Public Goods’, Overseas Development Council Policy Essay No. 25 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  45. 74.
    Max Lerner, Ideas for the Ice Age: Studies in a Revolutionary Era (New York: Viking, 1941), pp. 74–75 (emphasis added).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Myron J. Frankman 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myron J. Frankman
    • 1
  1. 1.McGill UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations