Advertisement

‘The true perfection of man’: Print, Public Opinion and the Idea of Progress

  • Caroline Franklin
Chapter
  • 70 Downloads
Part of the Literary Lives book series (LL)

Abstract

The newly born republic was proclaimed on 22 September, 1792 or ‘year 1 of Liberty’. It was depicted in a popular print as a newlyspawned infant Hercules: arising from the skirts of a brawny female sans-culottes, an earthy parody of the Virgin Mary. France was already at war with the monarchies of Russia, Prussia and Austria, whose armies had initially been repulsed. The early Utopian phase of the revolution was over. Dumouriez, the victorious French commander, was solicited by the advocates of revolution in Belgium and Holland to lend them his support.1 Now the revolution was to be spread abroad.

Keywords

Public Opinion French Revolution National Education Body Politic True Perfection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    R.R. Palmer, The World of the French Revolution (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1971), p. 99.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Helen Maria Williams, Letters from France (Boston: Thomas, Andrews, West and Larkin, 1792), II: 3, 16.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mark Philp, ‘English Republicanism in the 1790s’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 6:3 (1998), 235–62, 254.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williams, Letters from France, II: 43.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas Christie, Letters on the Revolution of France and on the New Constitution Established by the National Assembly, Occasioned by the Publications of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke MP and Alexander de Calonne, Late Minister of State, etc. (London: Johnson, 1791), I: 218.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morris Slavin, The Making of an Insurrection: Parisian Sections and the Gironde (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1986), pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gary Kates, The Cercle Social, The Girondins, and the French Revolution (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985), p. 205.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kates, The Cercle Social, The Girondins, and the French Revolution, pp. 178–93. See also, M.J. Sydenham, The Girondins (London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1961), ch.3.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See Carla Hesse ‘Economic upheavals in publishing 1775–1800’, in Robert Darnton and Daniel Roche (eds), Revolution in Print: The Press in France 1775–1800 (Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1989), pp. 69–97.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    For information on the periodical and newspaper press in the French Revolution I am indebted to: Emmet Kennedy, A Cultural History of the French Revolution (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1989), 317, 323.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Christie, Letters on the Revolution, I: 145–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.R. Palmer, The Improvement of Humanity: Education and the French Revolution (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985), p. 84.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kates, The Cercle Social, The Girondins, and the French Revolution, p. 193.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hugh Gough, The Newspaper Press in the French Revolution (London: Routledge, 1988), pp. 90–2.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simon Schama, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution (London: Penguin, 1989), p. 647.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schama, Citizens, p. 714.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sydenham, The Girondins, p. 97.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Life of Thomas Paine: with a History of His Literary, Political, and Religious Career in America, France, and England (London: Watts, 1909), p. 183.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abinger Archive, dep.b.210/7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Palmer, The Improvement of Humanity: Education and the French Revolution, p. 81. I am indebted to Palmer for details on the successive plans for national education.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Madame de Staël: Écrits retrouvés, ed. J. Isbell and S. Balayé, Cahiers staëliens, 46 (1994–45), 12–17.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Palmer, The Improvement of Humanity: Education and the French Revolution, pp. 97–9.Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    Palmer, The Improvement of Humanity: Education and the French Revolution, p. 166.Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    Schama, Citizens, p. 828.Google Scholar
  25. 27.
    M. Ray Adams, ‘Joel Barlow: Political Romanticist’, American Literature, 9 (May 1937), 113–52, 117.Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    Schama, Citizens, p. 706.Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    Durant, Supplement to Memoirs, pp. 251, 253.Google Scholar
  28. 30.
    George Forster’s Werke: Samtliche Schriften, tagebücher, Briefe, ed. Klaus-Georg Popp, vol. 17 Briefe 1792 Bis 1794 Und Nachträge (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1989), p. 339. My thanks to Ann Heilmann for translating this.Google Scholar
  29. 31.
    Gilbert Imlay, The Emigrants, or the History of an Expatriated Family, Being a Delineation of English Manners, Drawn from Real Characters, Written in America (London: A. Hamilton, 1793), I: 88.Google Scholar
  30. 32.
    Oliver Farrar Emerson, ‘Notes on Gilbert Imlay, early American writer’, PMLA, 39:2 (1924), 406–39.Google Scholar
  31. 33.
    Samuel Bernstein, Joel Barlow: A Connecticut Yankee in an Age of Revolution (Cliff Island, Maine: Ultima Thule Press, 1985), p. 103.Google Scholar
  32. 34.
    Emerson, ‘Notes on Gilbert Imlay, early American writer’, 415.Google Scholar
  33. 35.
    On this plan, see Bernstein, Joel Barlow: A Connecticut Yankee in an Age of Revolution, pp. 94–5, and Emerson, ‘Notes on Gilbert Imlay, early American writer’, 415–19.Google Scholar
  34. 36.
    Abinger archive, dep.b.214/3. Letter to Godwin of 13 Nov. 1797.Google Scholar
  35. 37.
    Abinger archive, dep.b.214/3Google Scholar
  36. 40.
    Tom Furniss, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution’ in Johnson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Mary Wollstonecraft, pp. 59–81, 69.Google Scholar
  37. 41.
    Karen O’Brien, ‘The history market in eighteenth-century England’, in Isabel Rivers (ed.), Books and Their Readers in Eighteenth-century England: New Essays (London and New York, Leicester University Press, 2001), pp. 105–34.Google Scholar
  38. 42.
    ‘“The grand causes which combine to carry mankind forward”: Woll-stonecraft, history and revolution’, Women’s Writing, 4:2 (1997), 155–72, 164.Google Scholar
  39. 43.
    Antoine-Nicolas de Condorcet, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind, tr. J. Barraclough (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1955), p. 100. Henceforth referred to parenthetically in the text.Google Scholar
  40. 44.
    Thomas P. Saine, Georg Forster (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1972), pp. 151–3. My account of Parisian Sketches is indebted to Saine.Google Scholar
  41. 45.
    Quotations are taken from: Jean Paul Saint-Etienne Rabaut, The History of the Revolution in France, translated by James White (New York: Greenleaf and Fellows, 1794) from henceforth cited in the text in parenthesis.Google Scholar
  42. 46.
    WMW, 6: 16. Henceforth referred to in the text as French Revolution.Google Scholar
  43. 47.
    John Whale, Imagination Under Pressure, 1789–1832 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 90.Google Scholar
  44. 48.
    Quoted by Jeremy Popkin, ‘Journals: The New Face of News’, in Darnton and Roche (eds), Revolution in Print, pp. 141–64, p. 164.Google Scholar
  45. 49.
    Bertrand de Barère, An Idea of Government, quoted in Analytical Review 27 (1798), 43.Google Scholar
  46. 50.
    Steven Blakemore, Crisis in Representation: Thomas Paine, Mary Wollstonecraft, Helen Maria Williams, and the Rewriting of the French Revolution (Madison and London: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1997), pp. 96–7.Google Scholar
  47. 51.
    Gregory Dart mistakenly states she is agreeing with Smith, in Rousseau, Robespierre and English Romanticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 122.Google Scholar
  48. 52.
    William Ogilvie, a Professor at Aberdeen University, published Essay of the Right of Property in Land (1781), proposing that unpropertied citizens be rented 40 acres of land. Common ownership would augment agrarian improvement and impede monopolies building up. Redistribution would be done gradually over a period of time. Thomas Paine, in Agrarian Justice (1795–96) proposed a fund be set up to compensate those who had cultivated the land for their dispossession of it. He was attacked for his moderation by Thomas Spence in Rights of Infants (1797). Spence asks for the social compact to be cancelled and land restored to the parishes to be rented out to farmers. He argues for the natural rights of all the human species to live off the land like other animals, for all wealth and improvements are produced by the work of the labouring classes. See M. Beer (ed.), The Pioneers of Land Reform: Thomas Spence, William Ogilvie and Thomas Paine (London: G. Bell & Sons, 1920).Google Scholar
  49. 53.
    See G.J. Barker-Benfield, ‘Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthswoman’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 50 (1989), 95–116.Google Scholar
  50. 54.
    Vivien Jones, ‘Women Writing Revolution: Narratives of History and Sexuality in Wollstonecraft and Williams’, in S. Copley and J. Whale (eds), Beyond Romanticism: New Approaches to Texts and Contexts 1780–1832 (London and New York: Routledge, 1992), pp. 178–99.Google Scholar
  51. 55.
    See Daniel O’Neill, ‘Shifting the Scottish paradigm: The Discourse of Morals and Manners in Mary Wollstonecraft’s French Revolution’, History of Political Thought, 23:1 (Spring, 2002), 90–116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Caroline Franklin 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline Franklin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WalesSwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations