Advertisement

The Meaning of Suffering

  • Renée Jeffery
Chapter
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

The concept of “evil” is marked by an intriguing paradox. On the one hand, it is a source of human fascination, its appeal commonly derived from the fact that it is associated with the “forbidden … the exotic, the surreal, and the extraordinary.”2 That is, evil is couched in mystery. Understood in this sense, it is often connected to witchcraft, defilement, and even physical deformity, and appeals to what Simone Weil described as our sense of “imaginary evil,” the “romantic and varied” evil of myths and fairytales.3 On the other hand however, what Weil terms “real evil,” is “gloomy, monotonous, barren, boring.”4 It is evil that we are quick to identify—as the plethora of evils identified in Chapter 1 would seem to suggest—but reluctant to confront in its stark reality. The paradox at play here is, of course, the fact that in many instances “imaginary evil” and “real evil” are actually one and the same; that is, the line separating reality from fantasy is an extremely blurry one. As Raimond Gaita explains, many “real” events commonly conceived as evil, particularly those, that inspire extreme moral condemnation, such as the Holocaust, exhibit mysterious elements.5 Thus, despite their very real, material nature and origins in human conduct, the very worst atrocities seem to include intangible, metaphysical features. Similarly, when Robert Manne characterizes the Holocaust as “a central event in human history,” he argues that it was “a deed so evil that the centuries would not wash its mystery away,” thereby drawing together a very “real” evil with the sense of mystery in which it is encased.6

Keywords

International Relation Human Suffering Holocaust Survivor Physical Deformity Theological Discourse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Charlotte Delbo, Auschwitz and After (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996), 226.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Terrie Waddell, Introduction to Cultural Expressions of Evil and Wickedness: Wrath, Sex and Crime, ed. Terrie Waddell (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003), ix.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simone Weil, Gravity and Grace (London: Routledge, 1952), 62–63. For example, as David Parkin’s edited collection The Anthropology of Evil makes clear, in the Balinese and Bantu languages, “evil” is related to that which is “physically rotten, misshapen and ugly.” Similarly, among the Piaroa Indians of Venezuela, while “good” is equated with beauty and cleanliness, “evil” is associated with dirt and ugliness. However, of greatest bearing on the Western tradition of thought about evil is its conceptualization in terms of imperfection within ancient Hebrew tradition. David Parkin, ed., Introduction to The Anthropology of Evil (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1995), 7; Mark Hobart, “Is God Evil?” in The Anthropology of Evil, 187; David Parkin, “Entitling Evil: Muslims and non-Muslims in Coastal Kenya,” in The Anthropology of Evil, 226. As Parkin notes, the relationship between “evil” and physical deformity can be extreme; babies born in the breach position and those who cut their top teeth before the first two that usually appear on the bottom are often deemed “bad” children. Joanna Overing, “There Is No End of Evil: The Guilty Innocents and Their Fallible God,” in The Anthropology of Evil, 254.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Raimond Gaita, “Refocusing Genocide: A Philosophical Responsibility,” in Genocide and Human Rights, by John K. Roth (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 162.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Robert Manne, The Culture of Forgetting: Helen Demidenko and the Holocaust, (Melbourne: Text Publishing, 1996), 107. Of course there are many thinkers that strongly refute the claim that evil has a mysterious aspect, preferring instead to view evil as “ordinary” and absolutely comprehensible. Their arguments will be discussed in some detail in Chapter 6. See Michael True, “Evil as Mystery: Primal Speech and Contemporary Poetry,” in Destined for Evil? The Twentieth Century Responses, ed. Predrag Cicovacki, (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2005), 241–47.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Delbo, quoted in Clendinnen, Reading the Holocaust, 62; Charlotte Delbo, Auschwitz and After (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995), 1. 8. W. B. Gallie, “Essentially Contested Concepts,” in Philosophy and HistoricalUnderstanding (New York: Shocken, 1968), 157–91.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Frederick Sontag, “How Should Genocide Affect Philosophy?” in Genocide and Human Rights: A Philosophical Guide, by John K. Roth (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 29.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Neil Forsyth, “The Origin of Evil: Classical or Judeo-Christian?” in Perspectives on Evil and Human Wickedness 1, no. 1 (January 2002): 17.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    David Pocock, “Unruly Evil,” in The Anthropology of Evil, ed. David Pocock (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985), 57.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    Alan Macfarlane, “The Root of All Evil,” in The Anthropology of Evil, ed. David Parkin (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985), 57.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Paul Ricoeur, The Symbolism of Evil, trans. E. Buchanan, (Boston: Beacon Press, 1967), 155; Hans Morgenthau, “The Evil of Politics and the Politics of Evil,” in Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political and Legal Philosophy 56, no. 1 (October 1945): 13.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    Parkin, Introduction to The Anthropology of Evil, 23.Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    Susan Neiman, Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), 2.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    Gillian Rose, Mourning Becomes the Law: Philosophy and Representation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 43. Rose seeks to distinguish, as Freud did before her, between mourning, “the sorrowful attitude of those who know the world is cursed by suffering and evil, and that loss must be endured,” and melancholia, which is marked by stasis, “the refusal to inhabit time, and accept loss, that is a sort of ‘bad faith’ alternative to mourning.” Clearly mourning allows and perhaps even facilitates intelligibility while melancholia does not. Rose in Charles T. Mathewes, Evil and the Augustinian Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 46; Rose, Mourning Becomes the Law, 76, 103.Google Scholar
  15. 20.
    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The First and Second Discourses Together with the Replies to Critics and Essay on the Origin of Language, ed. and trans. Victor Gourevitch (New York: Harper & Row, 1986).Google Scholar
  16. 21.
    Susan Neiman, “What’s the Problem of Evil?” in Rethinking Evil: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Maria Pia Lara (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001), 30–31.Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Theodore W. Adorno, “Cultural Criticism and Society,” in Prisms, trans. Samuel and Shierry Weber (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1967), 34.Google Scholar
  18. 24.
    Robert B. Pippin, “Hannah Arendt and the Bourgeois Origins of Totalitarian Evil,” in Modernity and the Problem of Evil, ed. Alan D. Schrift (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005), 149; Theodor Adorno, Negative Dialectics, trans. E. B. Ashton (New York: Seabury, 1973).Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    Adorno, quoted in After the Evil: Christianity and Judaism in the Shadow of the Holocaust, by Richard Harries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 33.Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    Primo Levi, Afterword in If This Is a Man, trans. Ruth Feldman, and The Truce, trans. Stuart Woolf (London: Abacus, 1987), 390. 27. Elie Wiesel, “Trivializing Memory,” in From the Kingdom of Memory:Reminiscences (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1990), 166.Google Scholar
  21. 28.
    Elie Wiesel, “Some Questions That Remain Open,” in Comprehending the Holocaust: Historical and Literary Research, ed. Asher Cohen and Charlotte Wardi (Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Peter Lang, 1988), 12–13.Google Scholar
  22. 29.
    Hannah Arendt, Preface to the first edition of The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951), new edition (New York: Brace: Harvourt and Jovanovich, 1973), viii.Google Scholar
  23. 31.
    Susan Sontag, On Photography, quoted in Regarding the Pain of Others (London: Penguin, 2003), 97.Google Scholar
  24. 37.
    Judith N. Shklar, Ordinary Vices (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1984), 3.Google Scholar
  25. 38.
    Ibid. 39. Pope John Paul II, Salvifici Doloris: On the Christian Meaning of HumanSuffering, February 11, 1984, 1; V. E. Frankl, quoted in Life’s Meaning in the Face of Suffering: Testimonies of Holocaust Survivors, by Teria Shantall (Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press, 2002), 33.Google Scholar
  26. 40.
    Jamie Mayerfeld, Suffering and Moral Responsibility (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 11.Google Scholar
  27. 41.
    Ibid., 12.Google Scholar
  28. 46.
    R. M. Hare, “Pain and Evil,” in Moral Concepts, ed. Joel Feinburg (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969), 29.Google Scholar
  29. 47.
    Ibid., 32.Google Scholar
  30. 48.
    Ibid., 35.Google Scholar
  31. 50.
    Amartya Sen, Commodities and Capabilities (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985); Martha Nussbaum, “Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism,” Political Theory 20 (1992): 202.Google Scholar
  32. 52.
    Ophir, The Order of Evils, 6.023, 261.Google Scholar
  33. 53.
    Emmanuel Levinas, Time and the Other, trans. Richard A. Cohen (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1987), 69.Google Scholar
  34. 54.
    David Kraemer, Responses to Suffering in Classical Rabbinic Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 4.Google Scholar
  35. 55.
    Roy F. Baumeister, Evil: Inside Human Cruelty and Violence (New York: Freeman, 1997), 18–19.Google Scholar
  36. 63.
    Erich H. Loewy, Suffering and the Beneficent Community: Beyond Libertarianism (New York: State University of New York Press, 1991), 4.Google Scholar
  37. 65.
    Josef Bleicher, Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as method, philosophy and critique, (London: Routledge, 1980), 1.Google Scholar
  38. 66.
    James A. Sanders, “Suffering as Divine Discipline in the Old Testament and Post-Biblical Judaism,” Colgate Rochester Divinity School Bulletin 29 (1955): 1; quoted in Kraemer, 34; see also Oliver Leaman, Evil and Suffering in Jewish Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  39. 67.
    Norman Solomon, Jewish Responses to the Holocaust (Centre for the Study of Judaism and Jewish-Christian Relations, Birmingham, UK, 1988), 8.Google Scholar
  40. 68.
    Of course different theories of punishment focus on different aspects of punishment. Traditionally, theoretical debates about punishment have taken place between proponents of consequentialism and retributivism. As Matt Matravers writes, “Consequentialist theory defends punishment as a means to secure greater utility, typically through individual and general deterrence. Retributivism, in contrast, justifies punishment through the notion of desert. The criminal is said to deserve to suffer for his past act of wrongdoing.” Matt Matravers, Introduction in Punishment and Political Theory, ed. Matt Matravers (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999), 1.Google Scholar
  41. 69.
    R. A. Dudd and D. Garland, “Introduction: Thinking About Punishment,” in A Reader on Punishment, ed. Antony Duff and David Garland (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 7. 70. Jeremy Bentham, quoted in After Evil: Responding to Wrongdoing, by Geoffrey Scarre (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2004), 7.Google Scholar
  42. 71.
    Ibid., 34.Google Scholar
  43. 72.
    Marilyn McCord Adams, “Redemptive Suffering: A Christian Solution to the Problem of Evil,” in Rationality, Religious Beliefs and Moral Commitment: New Essays on the Philosophy of Religion, ed. Robert Audi and William J. Wainwright (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986), 248–67.Google Scholar
  44. 77.
    V. E. Frankl, quoted in Life’s Meaning in the Face of Suffering: Testimonies of Holocaust Survivors, by Teria Shantall (Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press, 2002), 33. See V. E. Frankl, The Doctor and the Soul: From Psychotherapy to Logotherapy (New York: Bantam Books, 1969).Google Scholar
  45. 78.
    Arthur Schopenhauer, On the Suffering of the World, trans. R. J. Hollingdale (London: Penguin, 1970), 3.Google Scholar
  46. 79.
    C. G. Jung, Answer to Job, Vol. 11, Collected Works (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973); Carl Gustav Jung, “Searching for Self-Knowledge and Divine Wholeness,” in Destined for Evil? The Twentieth-Century Responses, ed. Predrag Cicovacki (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2005), 171–76.Google Scholar
  47. 85.
    R. J. Braham, quoted in Shantall, Life’s Meaning in the Face of Suffering, 94; see R. J. Braham (ed.), The Psychological Perspectives of the Holocaust and its Aftermath (Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1988). 86. For perhaps the most famous debate on this subject, see Bruno Bettelheim, Surviving and Other Essays (London: Thames and Hudson, 1979); and Terence Des Pres, The Survivor: An Anatomy of Life in the Death Camps (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  48. 87.
    Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals: A Polemic, trans. Douglas Smith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), 49.Google Scholar
  49. 88.
    Ibid., 136.Google Scholar
  50. 89.
    Emmanuel Levinas, “Useless Suffering,” in The Provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the Other, ed. Robert Bernasconi and David Wood, (London: Routledge, 1988), 157–58.Google Scholar
  51. 90.
  52. 91.
    Ibid., 159.Google Scholar
  53. 92.
  54. 93.
    Ibid., 162.Google Scholar
  55. 98.
    Clifford Geertz, “Ethos, World View, and the Analysis of Sacred Symbols,” in The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973), 130.Google Scholar
  56. 99.
    Clifford Geertz, “Religion as a Cultural System,” in The Interpretation of Cultures, 107–8.Google Scholar
  57. 100.
    William E. Connolly, Identity/difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Renée Jeffery 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renée Jeffery

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations