The Dual System of Land Use Policy and Its Related Problems in Contemporary China
- 85 Downloads
Land ownership is a crucial issue. Nearly all social struggles in history are “essentially for the ownership and use of land” (Weber 1988, 343). Throughout China’s history, land and its distribution have been central to any understanding of the country’s complex relationship between power, politics, and economics (Brenner 2004). Various land tenure policies provide an insight to the historical changes and to gauge rapidly changing social and economic landscape in contemporary China. China’s dual land tenure system has become a critical source of debate in China’s rising housing costs and widespread official corruption in land transactions. The dual system of land use reflects the transitional nature of Chinese economic structure that attempts to maintain centralized administrative control over land use and at the same time allows land allocation to those who can pay the highest price for commercial lease. The dual system creates an unparalleled opportunity for widespread corruption and various social problems.
KeywordsReal Estate Dual System Public Ownership Land Acquisition Social Unrest
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brenner, M. 2004. The evolution of land distribution in reform-era China. Political Economy Research Institute of University of Massachusetts. Available at: http://184.108.40.206/research/2004–2005/2004–2005–6/cip2/papers/brenner.pdf (accessed October 20, 2007).Google Scholar
- Chan, N. 2003. Land acquisition compensation in China: Problems and answers. International Real Estate Review 6: 136–152.Google Scholar
- Chen, J. H. 2006. When Ren Zhiqiang defends excessive profit in real estate, What does it reveal? The black-hole in the housing cost. Shanghai Securities Daily. October 24. Available at: http://www.chinanews.com.cn/estate (accessed October 20, 2006).
- Chen, W. 2002. Warning signs of increasing rural vs. urban inequality. China Youth Daily November 1.Google Scholar
- Clarke, S. 1982. Marx, marginalism and modern sociology: From Adam Smith to Max Weber. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
- The Constitution of the People’s Republic of China of 1975 and 1982.Google Scholar
- Editorial Office of China Land and Resources Almanac. 1999–2006. China Land and Resources Almanac 1999–2006. Beijing, China: Editorial Office of China Land and Resources Almanac.Google Scholar
- Hu, Yi. 2007. The central government investigates the collaboration between officials and business: Major shock for Shanghai real estate industry. New Century Weekly. Available at: http://www.dzwww.com/synr/jdxw/200705/t20070523_2176175.htm (In Chinese) (accessed October 28, 2007).
- Kremzner, M. T. 1998. Managing urban land in China: The emerging legal framework and its role in development. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 7: 611–654.Google Scholar
- Kreuger, A. 1974. The political economy of rent-seeking society. American Economic Review 64: 292–303.Google Scholar
- Larson, K. M. 1998. A lesson in ingenuity: Chinese farmers, the state, and the reclamation of farmland for most any use. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 7: 831–857.Google Scholar
- Li, H. 2004. From revolution to reform: A comparative study of China and Mexico. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
- Li, W. W., K. Li, and D. K. Xie. 2004. Farmer without land, work without job, minimum insurance without Qualification. Ningbo Daily March 3: A4.Google Scholar
- Lu, M. and C. Wiemer. 2007. Social equity in China: Building a Xiaokang society in an all-round way. Outreach Development November. Available at http://www1.worldbank.org/devoutreach/textonly.asp?id=354 (accessed November 16, 2007).
- —. 2000b. Cadre and corruption: The organizational involution of the Chinese Communist Party. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Palomar, J. 2004. Land tenure security as a market stimulator in China. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 12: 7–74.Google Scholar
- Phan, P. N. 2005. Enriching the land or the political elite? Lessons from China on democratization of the urban renewal process. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 14: 607–657.Google Scholar
- Pils, E. 2005. Land disputes, rights assertion, and social unrest in China: A case from Sichuan Columbia. Journal of Asian Law 19 (Spring): 235–292.Google Scholar
- Ravillion, M. and S. H. Chen. 2004. China’s (uneven) progress against poverty. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3408 .Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Southern Daily. 2007. Hu Xing’s corruption case in court: More than 10 million bribery in a single transaction. July 9. Available at http://www.southcn.com/news (In Chinese) (accessed November 15, 2007).
- Walder, A. 2003. Sociological dimensions of China’s economic transition: Organization, stratification, and social mobility. The Asia/Pacific Research Center of Stanford University. Working Paper. Available at http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/20208/Walder_Sociological.pdf (accessed December 5, 2007).Google Scholar
- Wang, F., T. O. Tai, and Y. J. Wang. 2006. A decade of rising poverty in urban China: Who are more likely to fall under. Working Paper 06–14. Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, Irvine. Available at http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1132&context=csd (accessed June 20, 2007).Google Scholar
- Weber, M. 1988. The agrarian sociology of ancient civilizations. Trans. F. R. I. Verso: London.Google Scholar
- Zhang, X. B. 2007. International and urban affairs: Asymmetric property rights in China’s economic growth. William Mitchell Law Review 33: 567–589.Google Scholar
- Zhou, T. Y. 2004. Protecting farmers’ rights in land transactions. China Economic Times February 10. Available at http://news.xinhuanet.com/house/2004–02/10/content_1307434.htm (In Chinese) (accessed November 5, 2007).