• S. M. Farid Mirbagheri
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)


Throughout this work we have attempted to address the three questions posed in the Introduction on the definitions of and circumstances for waging jihad and the importance of peace in Islam. In that regard different interpretations of the faith were outlined and it was illustrated that the Islamist radical reading of Islam does not reflect the totality of the religion. None of the schools in Islam outlined, whether conservative, radical, or liberal, can claim a monopoly on interpretation of the text. It was stated that the interpretation can and should vary with the historical development of humanity and that claims on the finality of any single reading can themselves be viewed as sacrilege for it would place the creature (humanity) equal to the Creator (God). The text remains constant and eternal but interpretation cannot and should not.


Pedantic Rationality Liberal Discourse Durable Peace Fundamentalist Discourse Transcendental Spirituality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Andrew Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community ( Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1998 ), p. 216.Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    Oliver Richmond, ‘A Post-Liberal Peace, Eirenism and the Everyday’, British International Studies Association, Review of International Studies 35 (2009), p. 558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 7.
    Oliver P. Richmond, A Post-Liberal Peace (manuscript), (London and New York: Routledge, 2011), p. 112. This book is a well-argued narrative of post-liberal peace in IR.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© S. M. Farid Mirbagheri 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Farid Mirbagheri
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations