Advertisement

Exclusivism, Pluralism, Postmodernism, Contextualism, and Hermeneutics

  • James Kraft
Chapter
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Religious disagreements take place in a context of general epistemic and metaphysical approaches to religious diversity. There are a number of such approaches to religious diversity that present views about the purpose, aim, commonality, and object of the religions. Some of the most popular ones include exclusivism, inclusivism, pluralism, and postmodernism. The approaches influence how people engage in religious disagreements, telling people what should be the ultimate outcome of them, how to understand them, whether they can even be resolved, and, if so, how. Because the approaches provide the background of any religious disagreement, it is essential to get more acquainted with them.1

Keywords

True Belief Religious Diversity Epistemic Situation World Religion Grand Narrative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    David Basinger, Religious Diversity: A Philosophical Assessment (Burlington: Ashgate, 2001).Google Scholar
  2. Philip Quinn and Kevin Meeker, eds., The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  3. Paul Griffiths, Problems of Religious Diversity (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001).Google Scholar
  4. Robert McKim, Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity (New York: Oxford, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Nathan King, “Religious Diversity and its Challenges to Religious Belief,” Philosophy Compass 3/4 (2008): 830–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 2.
    Swami Vivekananda, “Paper on Hinduism Delivered to the Parliament of the Religions,” in The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, ed. Swami Prajnananda (Almora: Sre Gauranga Press, 1915) 15–16.Google Scholar
  7. 3.
    John Hick, “Religious Pluralism,” in A Companion to Philosophy of Religion (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), 607–14.Google Scholar
  8. John Hick, Philosophy of Religion (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1989).Google Scholar
  9. John Hick, “The Epistemological Challenge of Religious Pluralism,” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 4.
    John DePoe, “The Significance of Religious Disagreement,” in Taking Christian Moral Thought Seriously, ed. Jeremy Evans and Daniel Heimbach (Nashville Tennessee: B&H Publishing Group, 2011), 48–76, 12.Google Scholar
  11. 5.
    Ren Descartes, Rules for the Direction of the Mind, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 11.Google Scholar
  12. 6.
    Martin Heidegger, “The Self-Assertion of the German University,” in The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader, ed. Richard Wolin (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992), 29–39.Google Scholar
  13. 7.
    Martin Heidegger, “The Question Concerning Technology,” in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, ed. William Lovitt (New York: Harper and Row, 1977), 3–35.Google Scholar
  14. Martin Heidegger, “The Age of the World Picture,” in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, ed. William Lovitt (New York: Harper and Rowe, 1977), 115–54.Google Scholar
  15. 8.
    Jacques Derrida, Margins of Philosophy, trans. Alan Bass (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  16. 9.
    Jean François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1984), 38.Google Scholar
  17. 11.
    Keith DeRose, “Solving the Skeptical Problem,” The Philosophical Review 104 (1995): 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keith DeRose, “Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense,” in Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, ed. John Greco and Ernest Sosa (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999) 187–205.Google Scholar
  19. Duncan Pritchard, “Two Forms of Epistemological Contextualism,” Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (2002): 19–55.Google Scholar
  20. James Kraft, “An Externalist, Contextualist Epistemology of Disagreement about Religion,” Ars Disputandi 9 (2009).Google Scholar
  21. Jonathan Schaffer, “From Contextualism to Contrastivism,” Philosophical Studies 119 (2004): 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 12.
    Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie (New York: Harper and Row, 1962).Google Scholar
  23. 13.
    Bill Brewer, Perception and Reason (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999)Google Scholar
  24. Bill Brewer, “Realism and the Nature of Perceptual Experience,” Philosophical Issues 14 (2004): 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. William Alston, “Back to the Theory of Appearing,” Philosophical Perspectives 13 (1999): 181–203.Google Scholar
  26. 14.
    Hans-Georg Gadamer, “On the Scope and Function of Hermeneutical Reflection,” in Philosophical Hermeneutics, ed. David Linge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976), 18–43.Google Scholar
  27. 16.
    Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method, trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall, 2nd ed. (New York: Crossroad, 1988), 270.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© James Kraft 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Kraft

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations