The Eastern Enlargement: Ideals, Interests and Integration

  • Katrin Milzow
Part of the International Relations and Development Series book series (IRD)


The issue of EU enlargement is intimately linked to the wider process of European integration. Already in 1957, the Treaty of Rome acknowledged and welcomed the possibility of enlarging the Community to which it gave birth,1 indicating that enlargement and deepening of cooperation were from the inception of the European project perceived to go hand in hand. The link between enlargement and the idea of European integration appears especially clearly in respect of the EU’s recent eastern enlargements. Due to their connection with the end of the Cold War, they arguably carry a greater symbolic weight than previous enlargements. On the one hand, EU enlargement to the East is seen to complete the post-Cold War unification of Europe. Simultaneously, Europe’s post-Cold War unity is, however, also regarded as a vindication of the European project which it is perceived to seal. This assimilation between geographic unity and organisational progress roots eastern enlargement particularly firmly within the process of integration as a whole.


National Interest European Council Institutional Reform Candidate State Discursive Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Garthoff, R. L., Détente and Confrontation, American-Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan, Washington, D.C., The Brookings Institution, 1994, p. 554.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Wallace, W., ‘Regionalism in Europe: Model or Exception?’, in Fawcett, L., Hurrell, A. (eds), Regionalism in World Politics, Regional Organisation and International Order, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 201–27; Ash, T. G., ‘Europe’s Endangered Liberal Order’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 77(2), p. 54;Google Scholar
  3. Hoffmann, S., ‘Obstinate or Obsolete? France, European Integration and the Fate of the Nation State’, in The European Sisyphus, Essays on Europe, 1964–1994, Boulder, Westview Press, 1995 (1966), pp. 78–84.Google Scholar
  4. For an opposing view see Magnette, P., Le regime politique de l’Union européenne, Paris, Presses de Sciences PO, 2003, p. 43.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    For an overview of this debate, see Baun, M. J., A Wider Europe, the Process and Politics of European Union Enlargement, op. cit. pp. 1, 3–8; or Cameron, F., ‘Widening and Deepening’, in Cameron, F. (ed.), The Future of Europe, Integration and Enlargement, London, Routledge, 2004, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    On the impact of enlargement on CFSP, see for example, Missiroli, A., Quille, G., ‘European Security in Flux’, in Cameron, F. (ed.), The Future of Europe, Integration and Enlargement, London, Routledge, 2004, p. 128.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Zaborowski, M., Germany, Poland and Europe, Conflict, Co-operation and Europeanisation, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2004, p. 143.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    Sedelmeier, U., ‘Eastern Enlargement: Risk, Rationality and Role-Compliance’, in Schimmelfennig, F., Sedelmeier, U. (eds), The Politics of European Union Enlargement, Theoretical Approaches, London, Routledge, 2005, p. 127.Google Scholar
  9. 87.
    Bertelsmann Foundation, Costs, Benefits and Chance of Eastern Enlargement for the European Union, Gütersloh, Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers, 1998, p. 7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Katrin Milzow 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katrin Milzow

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations