Advertisement

Endogenous Breakdown: The Conditions and Characteristics of Democracies Which Self-Destruct

  • Mark Chou
Chapter
  • 163 Downloads
Part of the The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy book series (PSTCD)

Abstract

This chapter challenges the ‘conventional position’ by putting forward the idea that democracy is innately fallible. Less an anomaly than a constitutive feature of democracy, this is a position which openly acknowledges that democracy is, at its peak, prone to being corrupted – by itself. Until now, this has not typically been a view shared by many supporters of democracy. Where democracies have suffered and collapsed as a result of illhealth, the tendency has largely been to see what extrinsic diseases has infected it. What very few have attended to is the prospect that that disease may just turn out to be democratic politics itself. And yet fewer still have chosen to remedy the maladies of democracy by first and foremost admitting to its constitutive failure. Laying the blame instead on other institutional, socioeconomic and political determinants, we have continued to misunderstand what ails democracy; thinking that it can, once removed of external impediments, be made perfect.

Keywords

Democratic Politics Political Determinant Political Governance Democratic Life Endogenous Termination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jeffrey C. Isaac, Democracy in Dark Times (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1998), p.5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    John Keane, The Life and Death of Democracy (London: Pocket Books, 2009), p.63.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mark Chou and Roland Bleiker, ‘The Symbiosis of Democracy and Tragedy: Lost Lessons from Ancient Greece,’ Millennium (Vol.37, No.3, 2009): 659–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mark Chou, ‘Democracy in an Age of Tragedy: Democracy, Tragedy and Paradox,’ Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory (Vol.11, No.2, 2010): 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    Cornelius Castoriadis, ‘The Greek Polis and the Creation of Democracy,’ in Cornelius Castoriadis (trans. and ed. David Ames Curtis), The Castoriadis Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), p.282.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Keane, The Life and Death of Democracy, pp.66, 75.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Ibid., p.71.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Ibid., p.568.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
  10. 9.
    Ibid., p.569.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Adrian Pabst, ‘The Crisis of Capitalist Democracy,’ Telos (Vol.152, 2010): 44–67, p.46Google Scholar
  12. Dick Howard, ‘Two Hundred Years of Error? The Politics of Democracy,’ Philosophy and Social Criticism (Vol.19, No.1, 1993): 15–24; p.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 11.
    Sheldon Wolin, Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010), pp.xx, xix.Google Scholar
  14. 12.
    Ibid., p.xxi.Google Scholar
  15. 13.
    Ibid., p.44, 46.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Ibid., pp.45–46.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    Henry A. Giroux, ‘Democracy and the Threat of Authoritarianism: Politics Beyond Barack Obama,’ truthout, 15 February 2010, http://truth-out.org/ print/56890.
  18. 16.
    Wolin, Democracy Incorporated, p.56.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    Dick Howard, ‘From Anti-Communism to Anti-totalitarianism: The Radical Potential of Democracy,’ Government and Opposition (Vol.37, No.4, 2002): 551–572, p.551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 18.
    Jacques Ranciere, Hatred of Democracy (London: Verso, 2006), p.4.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    Ibid., p.7.Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    Wolin, Democracy Incorporated, p.46.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    Paul Fairfield, Why Democracy? (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2008), pp.89–90.Google Scholar
  24. 22.
    Robert Moss, The Collapse of Democracy (London: Abacus, 1977), p.35.Google Scholar
  25. 23.
    Anne Sa’adah, ‘Hope, Disappointment, and Self-Restraint: Reflections on the Democratic Experiment,’ in Theodore K. Rabb and Ezra N. Suleiman (eds), The Making and Unmaking of Democracy: Lessons from History and World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2003), p.68.Google Scholar
  26. 24.
    Georg Sorensen, Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospects in a Changing World (Boulder: Westview Press, 1993), p.4Google Scholar
  27. John L. Safford, Democracy is Dangerous: Resisting the Tyranny of the Majority (Lanham: University Press of America, 2002), pp.9–10.Google Scholar
  28. 25.
    Alain Badiou, ‘The Democratic Emblem,’ Giorgio Agamben, Alain Badiou, Daniel Bensaid, Wendy Brown, Jean-Luc Nancy, Jacques Ranciere, Kristin Ross, and Slavoj Zizek, Democracy in What State? (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), p.13.Google Scholar
  29. 26.
    Robert D. Kaplan, ‘Was Democracy Just a Moment?,’ in Stephen John Goodlad (ed.), The Last Best Hope: A Democracy Reader (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001), p.50.Google Scholar
  30. 27.
    Ibid., p.57.Google Scholar
  31. 28.
    Pabst, ‘The Crisis of Capitalist Democracy,’ p.46; Howard, ‘Two Hundred Years of Error?,’ p.18.Google Scholar
  32. 29.
    Claude Lefort (trans. David Macey), Democracy and Political Theory (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988), p.19.Google Scholar
  33. 30.
  34. 31.
    Castoriadis, ‘The Greek Polis and the Creation of Democracy,’ p.274.Google Scholar
  35. 32.
    Lefort, Democracy and Political Theory, pp.19–20.Google Scholar
  36. 33.
    Ibid., p.28. Though it should be noted here that, for Lefort, this prospect is one that ‘implies the ruin of democracy.’ It does not represent the culmination of the historic adventure inaugurated by democracy; it inverts its meaning.Google Scholar
  37. 34.
    Romand Coles, Beyond Gated Politics: Reflections for the Possibility of Democracy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005), p.xi.Google Scholar
  38. 35.
    Ibid., pp.18–19; Pabst, ‘The Crisis of Capitalist Democracy,’ pp.44–67.Google Scholar
  39. 36.
    Alain Touraine and Kevin McDonald, ‘Democracy,’ Thesis Eleven (Vol.38, No.1, 1994): 1–15, p.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 37.
    Sheldon Wolin, ‘Fugitive Democracy,’ Constellations (Vol.1, No.1, 1994): 11–25, p.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 38.
    Safford, Democracy is Dangerous, p.viii.Google Scholar
  42. 39.
    Lawrence J. Hatab, ‘Prospects for a Democratic Agon: Why We Can Still Be Nietzscheans,’ Journal of Nietzsche Studies (Vol.24, 2002): 132–147, p.144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 40.
    Lawrence J. Hatab, A Nietzschean Defense of Democracy: An Experiment in Postmodern Politics (Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 1995), p.222.Google Scholar
  44. 41.
    Erich Kofmel, ‘Introduction,’ in Erich Kofmel (ed.), Anti-Democratic Thought (Exeter: Academic Imprint, 2008), p.1.Google Scholar
  45. 42.
    Jodi Dean, Democracy and other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
  46. 43.
    Adrian Little, ‘Democratic Melancholy: On the Sacrosanct Place of Democracy in Radical Political Theory,’ Political Studies (Vol.58, No.sn4}, 2010): 971–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 44.
    Ranciere, Hatred of Democracy, p.7.Google Scholar
  48. 45.
    Ibid., p.8; Little, ‘Democratic Melancholy,’ p.976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mark Chou 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Chou
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Arts and SciencesAustralian Catholic UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations