Advertisement

Towards a Theory of Democide

  • Mark Chou
Chapter
  • 236 Downloads
Part of the The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy book series (PSTCD)

Abstract

This chapter draws the book to a close by putting forward a theory of democide that seeks to synthesise both the exogenous and endogenous explanations so as to produce a more holistic understanding of how democracies break down. Drawing together contextual factors along with those characteristics inherent to democracy itself, this theory will paint a picture of collapse that shows how democracies can fail in and of themselves given the right circumstances and conditions. Using the well-known collapse of Weimar’s parliamentary democracy in the years preceding the Second World War as the key illustrative example, this chapter will therefore demonstrate the often indistinguishable exogenous and endogenous factors that are at play when a democracy elects to end its own life.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Daniel Bensaid, ‘Permanent Scandal,’ in Giorgio Agamben, Alain Badiou, Daniel Bensaid, Wendy Brown, Jean-Luc Nancy, Jacques Ranciere, Kristin Ross, and Slavoj Zizek, Democracy in What State? (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), p.19.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alexander Kirshner, ‘Proceduralism and Popular Threats to Democracy,’ Journal of Political Philosophy (Vol.18, No.4, 2010): 405–424, p.407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ibid., p.417.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gregory H. Fox and Georg Nolte, ‘Intolerant Democracies,’ Harvard International Law Journal (Vol.36, No.1, 1995): 1–70, pp.14–16Google Scholar
  5. David M. Estlund, Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008), p.1Google Scholar
  6. Ronald Dworkin, Is Democracy Possible Here? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006), p.131Google Scholar
  7. John Dunn, Setting the People Free: The Story of Democracy (London: Atlantic Books, 2005), p.149.Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    Kirshner, ‘Proceduralism and Popular Threats to Democracy,’ p.413.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    Robert Moss, The Collapse of Democracy (London: Abacus, 1977), p.35.Google Scholar
  10. 7.
    Samuel Issacharoff, ‘Fragile Democracies,’ Harvard Law Review (Vol.120, No.6, 2007): 1405–1467, pp.1451–1452. 8Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    David Plotke, ‘Democratic Polities and Anti-democratic Politics,’ Theoria (Vol.111, 2006): 6–44, p.16.Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    Ibid., p.21.Google Scholar
  13. 10.
    Paul Fairfield, Why Democracy? (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2008), pp.88–89.Google Scholar
  14. 11.
    Miguel Abensour, ‘ “Savage Democracy” and “Principle of Anarchy?”,’ Philosophy and Social Criticism (Vol.28, No.6, 2002): 703–726, p.708Google Scholar
  15. Sheldon Wolin, ‘Fugitive Democracy,’ Constellations (Vol.1, No.1, 1994): 11–25, pp.13–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 12.
    Jacqueline de Romilly, The Rise and Fall of States According to Greek Authors (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1977).Google Scholar
  17. 13.
    Peter C. Caldwell, Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1997), p.1Google Scholar
  18. Stephen E. Hanson, Post-Imperial Democracies: Ideology and Party Formation in Third Reich France, Weimar Germany, and Post-Soviet Russia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), p.123.Google Scholar
  19. 14.
    Ruth Henig, The Weimar Republic 1919–1933 (London and New York: Routledge, 1998), p.xi.Google Scholar
  20. 15.
    Issacharoff, ‘Fragile Democracies,’ p.1408.Google Scholar
  21. 16.
    Sheldon Wolin, Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010), p.53.Google Scholar
  22. 17.
    Karl Loewenstein, ‘Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I,’ American Political Science Review (Vol.31, No.3, 1937): 417–432, p.427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 18.
    Nancy Bermeo, Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003), pp.37–38.Google Scholar
  24. 19.
    Ibid., pp.26–27.Google Scholar
  25. 20.
    Henig, The Weimar Republic 1919–1933, p.78.Google Scholar
  26. 21.
    Herbert Kraus (intro. and ed. William Star Myers), The Crisis of German Democracy: A Study of the Spirit of the Constitution of Weimar (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1932), p.5.Google Scholar
  27. 22.
    Kurt Sontheimer, ‘Anti-democratic Thought in the Weimar Republic,’ in Lawrence Wilson (trans.), The Road to Dictatorship: Germany 1918–1933 (London: Oswald Wolff, 1964), p.42.Google Scholar
  28. 23.
    Stephen J. Lee, The Weimar Republic (London and New York: Routledge, 1998), p.17.Google Scholar
  29. 24.
  30. 25.
    Rosemary H.T. O’Kane, Paths to Democracy: Revolution and Totalitarianism (London and New York: Routledge, 2004), p.132.Google Scholar
  31. 26.
    Ibid., pp.132–133.Google Scholar
  32. 27.
    Giorgio Agamben, The State of Exception (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), p.2.Google Scholar
  33. 28.
  34. 29.
    John Keane, The Life and Death of Democracy (London: Pocket Books, 2009), p.569.Google Scholar
  35. 30.
    Claude Lefort, Democracy and Political Theory (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988), p.28.Google Scholar
  36. 31.
    Nadia Urbinati, ‘Peace and Democracy: Which Ends Justify Which Means?,’ New Political Science (Vol.32, No.1, 2010): 91–97, p.93.Google Scholar
  37. 32.
    Alan Keenan, Democracy in Question: Democratic Openness in a Time of Political Closure (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), p.7.Google Scholar
  38. 33.
    Ibid., p.3.Google Scholar
  39. 34.
    Loewenstein, ‘Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I,’ p.432.Google Scholar
  40. 35.
    Alexander Kirshner, A Theory of Militant Democracy, Unpublished Dissertation (New Haven: Yale University, 2011), p.2.Google Scholar
  41. 36.
    Jalal Alamgir, ‘State(ments) of Emergency: Anti-Democratic Narratives in Bangladesh,’ in Erich Kofmel (ed.), Anti-Democratic Thought (Exeter: Academic Imprint, 2008), pp.159–160.Google Scholar
  42. 37.
    Nomi Clare Lazar, States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), p.5.Google Scholar
  43. 38.
    Agamben, The State of Exception, p.2.Google Scholar
  44. 39.
    Bonnie Honig, Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009), p.2.Google Scholar
  45. 40.
    Lazar, States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies, p.80.Google Scholar
  46. 41.
    Nathalie Karagiannis, ‘Democracy as a Tragic Regime: Democracy and its Cancellation,’ Critical Horizons (Vol.11, No.1, 2010): 35–49, pp.43–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 42.
    Alexis de Tocqueville (trans. and ed. Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthorp), Democracy in America (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2000), p.241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 43.
    Ibid., p.235.Google Scholar
  49. 44.
    Ibid., p.249.Google Scholar
  50. 45.
    Keenan, Democracy in Question, p.13; Touraine and McDonald, ‘Democracy,’ p.10.Google Scholar
  51. 46.
    Fairfield, Why Democracy?, p.89.Google Scholar
  52. 47.
    See, for instance, Adrian Little and Moya Lloyd (eds), The Politics of Radical Democracy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
  53. Lars Tonder and Lasse Thomassen (eds), Radical Democracy: Politics Between Abundance and Lack (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
  54. William E. Connolly, Pluralism (Durham: Duke University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
  55. Bonnie Honig, Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
  56. Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe (trans. W. Moore and P. Cammack), Hegemony and Social Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso, 1985).Google Scholar
  57. 48.
    Cornelius Castoriadis, ‘The Greek and the Modern Political Imaginary,’ in Cornelius Castoriadis (ed. and trans. David Ames Curtis), World in Fragments: Writings on Politics, Society, Psychoanalysis, and the Imagination (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997), p.87.Google Scholar
  58. 49.
    Cornelius Castoriadis, ‘The Greek Polis and the Creation of Democracy,’ in Cornelius Castoriadis (trans. and ed. David Ames Curtis), The Castoriadis Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), p.282.Google Scholar
  59. 50.
  60. 51.
    Nathalie Karagiannis, ‘The Tragic and the Political: A Parallel Reading of Kostas Papaioannou and Cornelius Castoriadis,’ Critical Horizons (Vol.7, No.1, 2006): 309–319, p.310.Google Scholar
  61. 52.
    Anne Sa’adah, ‘Hope, Disappointment, and Self-Restraint: Reflections on the Democratic Experiment,’ in Theodore K. Rabb and Ezra N. Suleiman (eds), The Making and Unmaking of Democracy: Lessons from History and World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2003), p.84.Google Scholar
  62. 53.
    Karagiannis, ‘Democracy as a Tragic Regime,’ p.37.Google Scholar
  63. 54.
    Fox and Nolte, ‘Intolerant Democracies,’ p.60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mark Chou 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Chou
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Arts and SciencesAustralian Catholic UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations