Advertisement

Introduction Nursing Mothers and Sanctified Sisters: Women’s Political Behavior after the Restoration

  • Melinda S. Zook
Chapter
  • 124 Downloads
Part of the Early Modern History: Society and Culture book series

Abstract

After many weeks of listening to the “strong opinions” of Tabitha Smith, an Oxford glover named Richard Crutch decided to go to the authorities. In February 1686, he traveled to London and out of his “duty to his majesty” accused Smith of treasonable activity. She had come from the West Country to live with Richard and his wife, Katherine, about a month ago. Loquacious and opinionated, Smith had told them a fraught tale of daring and escape. Her husband, James, had joined the rebel leader, the Duke of Monmouth, at Lyme and had sent word to her in Taunton that she and their servants should prepare to provide horses and provisions for the rebellion. Tabitha Smith joined Monmouth’s army and saw action at Phillips-Norton where she herself commanded a company of horse. After the rebels’ defeat at Sedgemoor, Smith escaped back to Taunton “wearing men’s clothes” to secure what goods she had left. Colonel Kirke’s regiment came “speedily after.” Smith hid what she could, borrowed money from a shopkeeper in Bristol and made it to Oxford. Since Smith practiced the same trade as the Crutches, they had taken her into their home. But her bold talk soon made Richard apprehensive, and he regretted it. Smith swore that the Duke of Monmouth was still alive and would come again with 40,000 men. She boasted of having been entertained by a kinsman of the Earl of Derby’s in Lancashire, where they were raising money in preparation for Monmouth’s return.1

Keywords

Political Culture Nurse Mother Woman Writer Early Eighteenth Century Feminist Historian 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. 1.
    BL, Add. 41,804, ff. 257–257v. Tabitha Smith was probably referring to William Stanley, ninth Earl of Derby (c. 1655–1702) who was lord lieutenant for Cheshire and Lancashire.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    BL, Add. 41,804, ff. 258–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ibid., ff. 260, 262, 263.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The story of Tabitha Smith was reported to Secretary of State, Charles Middleton (BL, Add. 41, 804, ff. 257–63). There were at least two “James Smiths” in the Rebellion. One, a cloth worker, was tried in Taunton and sent to Jamaica. The other, a yeoman, was still at large. While neither of them fit Richard’s information, it is possible that one of them was Tabitha’s husband. W. MacDonald Wigfield, The Monmouth Rebels, 1685 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1985), p. 157; CSPD, James II, 1: 428, 430.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chapter 2 describes women who helped supply Monmouth’s army. On the tradition of women cross-dressing and joining armies, see Rudolf M. Dekker and Lotte C. van de Pol, eds., The Tradition of Female Transvestism in Early Modern Europe (New York: Palgrave, 1997).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Richard L. Greaves, Secrets of the Kingdom: British Radicals from the Popish Plot to the Revolution of 1688/89 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992), p. 335.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sara Mendelson and Patricia Crawford, Women in Early Modern England, 1550– 1720 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998); Bernard Capp, When Gossips Meet: Women, Family, and Neighborhood in Early Modern England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003); Hilda L. Smith, All Men and Both Sexes: Gender, Politics and the False Universal in England, 1640–1832 (University Park, PA: Penn State Press, 2002). Also see, James Daybell, ed., Women and Politics in Early Modern England, 1450–1700 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Katharine Gillespie, Domesticity and Dissent in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004) examines Dissenting women writers during the mid-century crisis; Susan Wiseman, Conspiracy and Virtue: Women, Writing, and Politics in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) discusses women writers from 1620 to 1688.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See, for example, Mary Lyndon Shanley and Carole Pateman, eds., Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory (Oxford: Polity Press, 1977); C. Levin, D. BarrettGraves, J. Elderidge Carney, eds., High and Mighty Queens in Early Modern England: Realities and Representations (New York: Palgrave, 2003); Clarissa Campbell Orr, ed., Queenship in Britain 1660–1837: Royal Patronage, Court Culture and Dynastic Politics (Manchester: Manchester University Press, reprint, 2010).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gary De Krey speaks to this in “Between Revolutions: Re-Appraising the Restoration in Britain,” History Compass 6/3 (2008): 738–73. http://historycompass.com/. Accessed 9/6/12.
  11. 11.
    See, for example, Keith Thomas, “Women and the Civil War Sects,” P&P 13 (1958): 42–62; Claire Cross, “ ‘He-Goats before the Flocks:’ A Note on the Part Played by Women in the Founding of Some Civil War Churches,” Studies in Church History 8 (1972): 195–202; Patricia Higgins, “The Reactions of Women, with Special Reference to Women Petitioners,” in Politics, Religion, and the English Civil War, ed. Brian Manning (London: Edward Arnold, 1973), pp. 179–222; Anne Laurence, “A Priesthood of She-Believers: Women and Congregations in MidSeventeenth-Century England,” in Women in the Church, eds. W.J. Shields and Diana Woods (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990); Phyllis Mack, Visionary Women: Ecstatic Prophecy in Seventeenth-Century England (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992); Sharon Achinstein, “Women on Top in the Pamphlet Literature of the English Revolution,” Women’s Studies 24 (1994): 131–63; Ann Hughes, “Gender and Politics in Leveller Literature,” in Political Culture and Cultural Politics in England, eds. Susan Amussen and Mark Kishlansky (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995), pp. 162–88; Stevie Davies, Unbridled Spirits: Women of the English Revolution, 1640–1660 (London: The Women’s Press, 1998); Hilary Hinds, God’s Englishwomen: Seventeenth-century Radical Sectarian Writing and Feminist Criticism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996); Elaine Hobby, “ ‘Come Live a Preaching Life:’ Female Community in the Seventeenth- Century Radical Sects,” in Female Communities, 1600–1800, eds. Rebecca D’Monte and Nicole Pohl (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000), pp. 76–91; Marcus Nevitt, Women and the Pamphlet Culture of Revolutionary England, 1640–1660 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006); Ann Hughes, Gender and the English Revolution (New York: Routledge, 2012) and for popular consumption, Alison Plowden, Women All on Fire: The Women of the English Civil War (Stroud, UK: Sutton Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    For example, Barry Coward, The Stuart Age: England, 1603–1714, 3rd Ed. (New York: Longman, 2003), p. 241.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    In addition to those works cited below, see Hannah Barker and Elaine Chalus, eds. Gender in Eighteenth-Century England: Roles, Representation and Responsibilities (London: Longman, 1997); Amanda Vickery, ed., Women, Privilege, and Power in British Politics, 1750 to the Present (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001); Anne K. Mellor, Mothers of the Nation: Women’s Political Writings in England, 1780– 1830 (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press, 2000); Elizabeth Egar, Charlotte Grant, Cliona O’Gallchoir and Penny Warburton, eds., Women, Writing and the Public Sphere, 1700–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2001).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.H. Plumb, England in the Eighteenth Century (1714–1815) (London: Penguin, 1959); J.D.C. Clark, English Society, Religion, Ideology, and Politics during the Ancien Regime (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000). Of more recent vintage is Linda Colley’s Britons: Forging a Nation, 1707–1837 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992) which speaks to both eighteenth-century politics and national identity and includes an important chapter on women and nationalism.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kathryn Gleadle and Sarah Richardson, eds., Women in British Politics, 1760–1860: The Power of the Petticoat (London: Macmillan Press, 2000), Introduction, p. 9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elaine Chalus, Women in English Political Life, c. 1754–1790 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005), pp. 6, 12. Also see her: “Elite Women, Social Politics, and the Political World of Late Eighteenth-Century England,” HJ 43/3 (2000): 669–707; “My Minerva at my Elbow:” The Political Roles of Women in Eighteenth-Century England” in Hanoverian Britain and Empire: Essays in Memory of Philip Lawson, eds. Stephen Taylor, Richard Connors, and Clyve Jones (Woodbridge, UK: The Boydell Press, 1998). Chalus has also spoken to the importance of understanding the political roles of women in Augustan England; see “ ‘Ladies Are often Very Good Scaffoldings:’ Women and Politics in the Age of Anne,” Parliamentary History 28/1 (2009): 150–65.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rachel Weil, Political Passions: Gender, the Family, and Political Argument in England, 1680–1714 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999); Lois G. Schwoerer, “Women and the Glorious Revolution,” Albion 18 (1986): 195–218.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Edward Gregg, Queen Anne (London: Ark Paperbacks, 1984); Frances Harris, A Passion for Government: The Life of Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991); Robert Bucholz, The Augustan Court of Queen Anne and the Decline of Court Culture (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    In older accounts of the period, such as J.R. Jones, The Revolution of 1688 in England (New York: W.W. Norton, 1972) the absence of women other than queens and mistresses is predictable enough. But newer surveys of the era are little better. For example, in Tim Harris, Politics under the Later Stuarts (New York: Longman, 1993) “women” are mentioned twice.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mendelson and Crawford, Women, p. 345; Wiseman, Conspiracy, p. 2.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Letter to a Gentlewomen Concerning Government (London, 1697), p. 27.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    NA SP29/44, 93.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    On Lady Russell’s influence after the Revolution, see Lois G. Schwoerer, Lady Rachel Russell: “One of the Best of Women” (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988), p. 190; Elizabeth Burnet’s activities are explored in Chapter 5.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    On late Stuart political culture, see Mark Knights, Representation and Misrepresentation in Later Stuart Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005); on women and political culture, see Lois G. Schwoerer, “Women’s Public Political Voice in England, 1640–1740,” in Women Writers and the Early Modern British Political Tradition, ed. Hilda L. Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 56–74; and Capp, When Gossips, pp. 288–319.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Knights, Representation, p. 18.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elizabeth Gaunt, Mrs. Elizabeth Gaunt’s Last Speech who Was Burnt at London October 23, 1685, as Was Written by her own Hand (London, 1685), broadside. After admitting her crime, she cleverly quotes 1 Samuel 14:43 wherein Jonathan explains to King Saul that he ate a bit of honey not knowing that it was forbidden. Her story is fully explored in Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mary Mollineux, The Fruits of Retirement: or, Miscellaneous Poems, Moral and Divine (London, 1702), see Henry Mollineux, “A few Words more, in Remembrance of my dear Wife, M.M,” pages unnumbered.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    One of the few exceptions is Susan Wiseman’s Conspiracy and Virtue which examines both royalist and sectarian cultures.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    On Behn, see, for example, Arlen Feldwick, “Wits, Whigs, and Women: Domestic Politics as Anti-Whig Rhetoric in Aphra Behn’s Town Comedies,” in Political Rhetoric, Power and Renaissance Women, eds. Carole Levin and Patricia A. Sullivan (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1955) and Anita Pacheco, “Reading Toryism in Aphra Behn’s Cit-Cuckolding Comedies,” The Review of English Studies, 55/22 (2004): 690–708. On Astell, see for example, Van C. Hartman, “Tory Feminism in Mary Astell’s Bart’lemy Fair,” 28 (Fall 1998) The Journal of Narrative Technique 28 (1998): 243–65.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    In addition to those works cited in note 10, see Diane Willen, “Religion and the Construction of the Feminine,” in A Companion to Early Modern Women’s Writing, ed., Anita Pacheco (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002), pp. 22–39; Judith Scheffler, “Prison Writings of Early Quaker Women,” Quaker History 73 (1984): 25–37; Catie Gill, Women in the Seventeenth-Century Quaker Community: A Literary Study of Political Identities, 1650–1700 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005); Curtis W. Freeman, A Company of Women Preachers: Baptist Prophetesses (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    There are, of course, exceptions, Patricia Crawford, Women and Religion in England, 1500–1720 (New York: Routledge, 1993) addresses Anglican women; also see W.J. Sheils and D. Wood, eds., Women in the Church (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tim Harris is fond of talking about “out-of-doors” politics, see, for example, his Restoration: Charles II and his Kingdoms (London: Penguin Books, 2005), p. 6, 13–14.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chalus, Women in English Political Life, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    “A Congratulatory Poem to her Sacred Majesty Queen Mary, upon Her Arrival in England” (1689), in Behn, Works, 1:306.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Irenicism in Christian theology is rooted in Renaissance humanist ideals and aimed at unifying Christian systems though reason.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Patricia Springborg has done a great service to Astell scholarship with her edition of three of Astell’s Tory tracts; see Mary Astell, Political Writings, ed. Patricia Springborg (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996); also see Springborg, Mary Astell: Theorist of Freedom from Domination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) and the edited collection, Mary Astell: Reason, Gender, Faith, eds. William Kolbrener and Michal Michelson (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Melinda S. Zook 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melinda S. Zook
    • 1
  1. 1.Purdue UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations