• Yuko Kasuya


This book is concerned with executive-legislative relations in the presidential and semi-presidential democracies of Asia. Since around the mid-1980s, comparative politics scholars have advanced our understanding of differences in executive-legislative relations and their impact on many aspects of political life. These impacts include regime stability, the quality of governance, policy-making processes, formation of parties and party systems, ethnic conflict, and even the international actions of the states.1 These consequences have been analysed with a focus on differences in the two basic forms of executive-legislative relations — that is, (semi-) presidential versus parliamentary government — as well as with a focus on executive-legislative relations within one form of government. This book’s focus belongs to the latter type of analysis; specifically, it centers on executive-legislative relations within presidential and semi-presidential governments.


Party System Liberal Democratic Party American Political Science Review Veto Player Ethnic Conflict 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adsera, A., C. Boix and M. Payne (2003) ‘Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 445–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beliaev, M. V. (2006) ‘Presidential Powers and Consolidation of New Post Communist Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bratton, M and N. van de Walle (1997) Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transition in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carey, J. M. and M. S. Shugart (eds) (1998) Executive Decree Authority (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  5. Cheibub, J. A. (2006) ‘Presidentialism, Electoral Identifiabilty, and Budget Balances in Democratic Systems’, American Political Science Review, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheibub, J. A. (2007) Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  7. Cheibub, J. A. (2009) ‘Making Presidential and Semi-Presidential Constitutions Work’, Texas Law Review, vol. 81, pp. 1375–1407.Google Scholar
  8. Cheibub, J. A. and S. Chernykh (2008) ‘Constitutions and Democratic Performance in Semi-presidential Democracies’, Janapese Journal of Political Science, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 269–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Croissant, A. (2003) ‘Legislative Powers, Veto Players, and the Emergence of Delegative Democracy: A Comparison of Presidentialism in the Philippines and South Korea’, Democratization, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 68–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dukenbaev, A. and W. W. Hansen (2003) ‘Understanding Politics in Kyrgyzstan’, DEMSTAR Research Report no. 16, Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus.Google Scholar
  11. Elgie, R. (ed.) (1999) Semi-presidentialism in Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Elgie, R. (2011) Semi-presidentialism: Sub-types and Democratic Performance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elgie, R and S. Moestrup (eds) (2007) Semi-presidentialism outside Europe (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  14. Elgie, R and S. Moestrup (eds) (2008) Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  15. Elgie, R and I. McMenamin (2008) ‘Semi-presidentialism and Democratic Performance’, Janapese Journal of Political Science, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elman, M. F. (2000) ‘Unpacking Democracy: Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Theories of Democratic Peace’, Security Studies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 91–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freedom House (2008) Freedom of the World, at: (accessed 31 August 2009).Google Scholar
  18. Foweraker, J and T. Landman (2002) ‘Constitutional Design and Democratic Performance’, Democratization, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fukuyama, F., B. Dressel and B. Chang (2005) ‘Facing the Perils of Presidentialism?’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerring, J. and S. Thacker (2008) A Theory of Centripetal Democratic Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haggard, S and M. D. McCubbins (eds) Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  22. Hellwig, T. and D. J. Samuels (2007) ‘Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  23. Hicken, A. (2009) Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huskey, E. (2007) ‘Eurasian Semi-presidentialism: The Development of Kyrgystan’s Model Of Government’, in R. Elgie and S. Moestrup (eds), Semi-presidentialism outside Europe (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 161–180.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, B. (2000) ‘Electoral Politics and Economic Crisis, 1997–1998’, in L. Diamond and B. K. Kim (eds), Consolidating Democracy in South Korea (Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  26. Kirschke, L. (2007) ‘Semi-presidentialism and the Perils of Power-sharing in Neopatrimonial States’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1372–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Linz, J and A. Valenzuela (eds) (1994) The Failure of Presidential Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Mainwaring, S. and M. S. Shugart (eds) (1997) Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  29. Minnich, D. J. (2005) ‘Veto Players, Electoral Incentives and International Commitments: The Impact of Domestic Institutions on Intergovernmental Organization Membership’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 295–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Negretto, G. L. (2006) ‘Minority Presidents and Democratic Performance in Latin America’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Persson, T and G. Tabelinni (2003) The Economic Effects of Constitutions (Boston: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  32. Reilly, B. (2006) Democracy and Diversity: Political Engineering in the Asia-Pacific (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roper, S. D. (2002) ‘Are All Semipresidential Regimes The Same?’, Comparative Politics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rüland, J. (2003) ‘Constitutional Debates in the Philippines: From Presidentialism to Parliamentarianism?’, Asian Survey, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 461–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Yuko Kasuya 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuko Kasuya

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations