Activism and Research on TNCs and Human Rights: Building a New International Normative Regime

  • William H. Meyer


The impact of transnational corporations (TNCs) on human rights was once a largely neglected subject. Early attention to human rights after the Second World War was focused almost exclusively on the actions of nation states. That was perhaps as it should be, given the fact that governments are both the worst violators of human rights, and the institutions that are charged by international law with the primary responsibilities for protecting them. More recently human rights violations by TNCs have received increased attention. There has been a spate of new studies that seek to research the connections between transnationals and human rights. New political activism has also sought to identify and reduce violations of human rights by TNC production facilities (for example, sweatshops).


World Trade Organization International Labor Organization North American Free Trade Agreement Transnational Corporation Full Disclosure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barshefsky, Charlene. 1999. ‘Toward Seattle: the Next Round and America’s Stake in the Trading System’, Public address to the Council on Foreign Relations, New York City, 19 October. Available at ppl019.htm.
  2. Donnelly, Jack. 1998. International Human Rights. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  3. Greenhouse, Steven. 1999. ‘Nike Identifies Plants Abroad Making Goods for Universities’, New York Times, 8 October 1999.Google Scholar
  4. Imle, John F., Jr. 1999. ‘Transnationals and the New World of Energy Development’, Journal of International Affairs 53(1): 263–80.Google Scholar
  5. Knight, C. Foster. 1995. ‘NAFTA Promises Payoff in Environmental Benefits’, Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, Summer.Google Scholar
  6. Manby, Bronwen. 1999. ‘The Role and Responsibility of Oil Transnationals in Nigeria’, Journal of International Affairs 53(1): 281–301.Google Scholar
  7. Manning, Jeff. 1998. ‘Sweatshop Pact Advances’, The Oregonian, 4 November.Google Scholar
  8. Meyer, William H. 1996. ‘Human Rights and MNCs: Theory vs. Quantitative Analysis’, Human Rights Quarterly 18(2): 368–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Meyer, William H. 1998. Human Rights and International Political Economy in Third World Nations: MNCs, Foreign Aid and Repression. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.Google Scholar
  10. Meyer, William H. 1999. ‘Confirming, Infirming and “Falsifying” Theories of Human Rights: Reflections on Smith, Bolyard and Ippolito through the Lens of Lakatos’, Human Rights Quarterly 21(1): 220–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. National Consumers League. 1998. ‘Preliminary Agreement: Charter Document for the Fair Labor Association, Prepared by the Apparel Industry Partnership’, 2 November.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, Jackie, Melissa Bolyard and Anna Ippolitio. 1999. ‘Human Rights and the Global Economy: a Response to Meyer’, Human Rights Quarterly 21(1): 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sobek, Stephen. 1999. ‘Coalition Uses Web to Reveal Lawmakers’ Stance on Sweatshops’, Gannett News Service (online), 27 July. At
  14. Spar, Deborah L. 1998. ‘The Spotlight and the Bottom Line: How Multinationals Export Human Rights’, Foreign Affairs 77(1): 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wickham, Kathleen. 1999. ‘Students Call for End to Sweatshop Conditions’, Gannett News Service (online), 12 July. At
  16. Winston, Morton. 1999. ‘Review of Human Rights and International Political Economy in Third World Nations by William H. Meyer’, Human Rights Quarterly 21(3): 828–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jedrzej George Frynas and Scott Pegg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • William H. Meyer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations