Regulating Transnational Corporations through Corporate Codes of Conduct

  • Alex Wawryk


As a result of the failure of transnational corporations (TNCs) to observe minimum standards of human rights in their operations, a number of different legal means for regulating the behavior of TNCs have been suggested and debated over the years. As the title implies, this chapter is concerned specifically with the regulation of TNCs through the adoption and enforcement of a code of conduct. A code of conduct is a written policy or statement of principles intended to serve as the basis for a commitment to a particular conduct (Dubin 1999, p. 42). To be effective as a means of regulation, a code of conduct should not only set out the principles to guide behavior but must also establish mechanisms for implementation, monitoring and enforcement and review of the code.


Environmental Management System Multinational Enterprise Corporate Code Forest Stewardship Council Transnational Corporation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ACC. 2002. ‘Management Systems Verification Participants List Through 1/2002’,
  2. ACC. 2001. Responsible Care® News, September 2001,
  3. ACC. 2000. ‘Responsible Care® MSV — ISO 14001 Matrix’,
  4. API. 2001. Environmental Stewardship Program Pledge for CAREFUL Operations,
  5. Baade, Hans. 1979. ‘The Legal Effects of Codes of Conduct for Multinational Enterprises’, German Yearbook of International Law 22: 11–52.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, Mark. 1993. ‘Private Codes of Conduct: Should the Fox Guard the Henhouse?’, University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 24(3): 399–433.Google Scholar
  7. Bloomfield, Heidi. 1999. ‘“Sweating” the International Garment Industry: a Critique of the Presidential Task Force’s Workplace Codes of Conduct and Monitoring System’, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 22: 567–95.Google Scholar
  8. Bray, John. 1999. ‘Petroleum and Human Rights: the New Frontiers of Debate’, Oil and Gas Journal (1 November): 65–9.Google Scholar
  9. Cassel, Douglas. 1996. ‘Corporate Initiatives: a Second Human Rights Revolution?’, Fordham International Law Journal 19: 1963–84.Google Scholar
  10. CERES. 1992. Guide to the CERES Principles 2, ‘Introduction’, reprinted in J. Andy Smith III. 1993. ‘The CERES Principles: a Voluntary Code for Corporate Environmental Responsibility’, Yale Journal of International Law 18: 307–17.Google Scholar
  11. CERES. 2002. ‘Endorsing Companies,’
  12. CMA (US). 1999. ‘Public Advisory Panel Elements of Responsible Care’,
  13. Cohen, Madeline. 1996. ‘A New Menu for the Hard-Rock Cafe: International Mining Ventures and Environmental Cooperation in Developing Countries’, Stanford Environmental Law Journal 15: 130–86.Google Scholar
  14. Compa, Lance and Tashia Hinchliffe-Darricarrere. 1995. ‘Enforcing Labour Rights through Corporate Codes of Conduct’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 33: 663–89.Google Scholar
  15. Conservation International. 1997. Reinventing the Well: Approaches to Minimising the Environmental and Social Impact of Oil Development in the Tropics. Washington: Conservation International.Google Scholar
  16. Cueto, Santiago. 1997. ‘Oil’s Not Well in Latin America: Curing the Shortcomings of the Current International Environmental Law Regime in Dealing With Industrial Oil Pollution in Latin America through Codes of Conduct’, Florida Journal of International Law 11(3): 585–611.Google Scholar
  17. De George, Richard. 1997. ‘“Sullivan-Type” Principles for U.S. Multinationals in Emerging Economies’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 18(4): 1193–210.Google Scholar
  18. Dubin, Laurence. 1999. ‘The Direct Application of Human Rights Standards to, and by, Transnational Corporations’, Review of the International Commission of Jurists 61: 35–66.Google Scholar
  19. European Parliament. 1999. Resolution on European Union Standards for European Enterprises Operating in Developing Countries, adopted 14 January 1999, O/C (Official Journal of the European Communities) 104 at 180.Google Scholar
  20. Fatouros, A. 1981. ‘On the Implementation of International Codes of Conduct: an Analysis of Future Experience’, American University Law Review 30: 941–72.Google Scholar
  21. Feld, W. 1980. Multinational Corporations and U.N. Politics: the Quest for Codes of Conduct. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fikentscher, Wolfgang. 1982. ‘United Nations Codes of Conduct: New Paths in International Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 30: 577–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gagnon, Georgette and John Ryle. 2001. ‘Report of an Investigation into Oil Development, Conflict and Displacement in Western Upper Nile, Sudan’. Ottawa: Canadian Auto Workers Union, Steelworkers Humanity Fund, The Simons Foundation, United Church of Canada, Division of World Outreach and World Vision Canada.Google Scholar
  24. Gereffi, Gary, Ronie Garcia-Johnson and Erika Sasser. 2001. ‘The NGO-Industrial Complex’, Foreign Policy 125: 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gunningham, Neil. 1995. ‘Environment, Self-Regulation, and the Chemical Industry: Assessing Responsible Care’, Law and Policy 17(1): 57–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gunningham, Neil. 1998a. ‘The Chemical Industry’, in Neil Gunningham and Peter Grabosky, eds, Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gunningham, Neil. 1998b. ‘Environmental Management Systems and Community Participation: Rethinking Chemical Industry Regulation’, University of California Los Angeles Journal o f Environmental Law and Policy 16(2): 319–98. Reprinted on-line by the Gale Group, at, 1–73.Google Scholar
  28. Hagen, Katherine. 1998. ‘Issues Involving Codes of Conduct from an ILO Perspective’, American Society of International Law Proceedings 92: 267–77.Google Scholar
  29. Hepple, Bob. 1999. ‘A Race to the Top? International Investment Guidelines and Corporate Codes of Conduct’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 20: 347–61.Google Scholar
  30. ICCA. 1998. Responsible Care® Status Report,
  31. ICCA. 2000. Responsible Care® Status Report,
  32. Krug, Nicole. 1998. ‘Exploiting Child Labor: Corporate Responsibility and the Role of Corporate Codes of Conduct’, New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 14: 651–76.Google Scholar
  33. McCrudden, Christopher. 1999. ‘Human Rights Codes for Transnational Corporations: What Can the Sullivan and MacBride Principles Tell Us?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19: 167–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ocran, T. 1986. ‘Interregional Codes of Conduct for Transnational Corporations’, Connecticut Journal o f International Law 2: 121–48.Google Scholar
  35. Ong, David. 1997. ‘International Legal Developments in Environmental Protection: Implications for the Oil Industry’, Australasian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy 4(1): 55–106.Google Scholar
  36. Perez-Lopez, Jorge. 1993. ‘Promoting International Respect for Worker Rights through Business Codes of Conduct’, Fordham International Law Journal 17(1): 1–47.Google Scholar
  37. Pink, Daniel. 1990. ‘The Valdez Principles: Is What’s Good for America Good for General Motors?’, Yale Law and Policy Review 8: 180–95.Google Scholar
  38. Pitt, Harvey and Karl Groskaufmanis. 1990. ‘Minimizing Corporate Civil and Criminal Liability: a Second Look at Corporate Codes of Conduct’, Georgetown Law Journal 78: 1559–654.Google Scholar
  39. Porges, Jennifer. 1997. ‘Codes of Conduct’, Asian Labour Update 26: 1–5.Google Scholar
  40. Rubin, Seymour. 1995. ‘Transnational Corporations and International Codes of Conduct: a Study of the Relationship between International Legal Cooperation and Economic Development’. American University Journal of International Law and Policy 10(4): 1275–89 (reprint with Introduction); originally published. 1981. American University Law Review 30:903–21.Google Scholar
  41. Sanders, Peter. 1982. ‘Implementing International Codes of Conduct for Multinational Enterprises’, American Journal of Comparative Law 30: 241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, J. Andy III. 1993. ‘The CERES Principles: a Voluntary Code for Corporate Environmental Responsibility’, Yale Journal of International Law 18: 307–17.Google Scholar
  43. Toftoy, Ryan. 1998. ‘Now Playing: Corporate Codes of Conduct in the Global Theater. Is Nike Just Doing It?’, Arizona Journal o f International and Comparative Law 15(3): 905–29.Google Scholar
  44. Trainor, Karen. 1997. ‘Taking the Myth Out of Environmental Management Systems’, 1997 Australian Mining and Petroleum Law Association Yearbook 555–63.Google Scholar
  45. United Nations. 2000. UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, ‘Proposed Draft Human Rights Code of Conduct for Companies’, Working paper prepared by David Weissbrodt. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/WG.2/WP.l/Add.l (25 May).Google Scholar
  46. United Nations Secretariat. 1976. Transnational Corporations: Issues Involved in the Formulation of a Code of Conduct, UN Doc E/C.10/17, 20 July 1976. New York, United Nations.Google Scholar
  47. Voon, Tania. 1999. ‘Multinational Enterprises and State Sovereignty under International Law’, Adelaide Law Review 21(2): 219–52.Google Scholar
  48. Wälde, Thomas. 1992. ‘Environmental Policies towards Mining in Developing Countries’, Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 10(4): 327–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wasserstrom, Robert and Susan Reider. 1998. ‘Petroleum Companies Crossing New Threshold in Community Relations’, Oil and Gas Journal, 14 December, 24–7.Google Scholar
  50. Wells, Dick. 1997. ‘Corporate Environmental Management Systems’, 1997 Australian Mining and Petroleum Law Association Yearbook 530–63.Google Scholar
  51. Williams, Bob. 1997a. ‘Foreign Petroleum Firms Developing New Paradigm for Operating in Rain Forest Region’, Oil and Gas Journal, 21 April, 37–42.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, Bob. 1997b. ‘Oxy’s Strategy on Environment, Community Issues Key to Success of Project in Ecuador’s Rain Forest’, Oil and Gas Journal, 21 April, 45–9.Google Scholar
  53. Zondorak, Valerie. 1991. ‘A New Face in Corporate Environmental Responsibility: the Valdez Principles’, Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 18: 457–99.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jedrzej George Frynas and Scott Pegg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Wawryk

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations