Advertisement

The Transnational Garment Industry in South and South-East Asia: a Focus on Labor Rights

  • Jedrzej George Frynas
Chapter

Abstract

In the last few decades, labor-intensive industries such as garment production have increasingly been relocated from developed countries to developing countries with lower labor costs, such as China, the Philippines and Indonesia (Dicken 1998, pp.290–1). In many of these developing countries, human rights standards are lower, and garment firms violate some of the key internationally accepted human rights. This chapter examines the impact of transnational garment firms on human rights in South and South-East Asia by focusing on labor rights.

Keywords

Minimum Wage Trade Union Child Labor International Labor Organization Transnational Corporation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bangladesh People Solidarity Centre. 1998. ‘Unstitching the Child Labor Debate’, Amsterdam: Bangladesh People Solidarity Centre.Google Scholar
  2. Blanpain, Roger, ed. 2000. Multinational Enterprises and the Social Challenges of the XXIst Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  3. Burns, Maggie and Celia Mather. 1999. UK Companies in Indonesia — Responses to Ethical Trade Issues. London: CIIR.Google Scholar
  4. Dicken, P. 1998. Global Shift: Transforming the World Economy. Third edn. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  5. Ekachai, Sanitsuda. 1999. ‘A Life of Hard Labor’, Bangkok Post, 15 April.Google Scholar
  6. Emmelhainz, Margaret A. and Ronald J. Adams. 1999. ‘The Apparel Industry Response to “Sweatshop” Concerns: a Review and Analysis of Codes of Conduct’, Journal of Supply Chain Management (Summer).Google Scholar
  7. FHKI. 1990. ‘Hong Kong’s Offshore Investment’, Hong Kong: Industry and Research Division, Federation of Hong Kong Industries.Google Scholar
  8. Green, Duncan. 1998. Fashion Victims: Together We Can Clean Up the Clothes Trade — the Asian Garment Industry and Globalisation. London: CAFOD.Google Scholar
  9. Khanna, S.R. 1993. ‘Structural Changes in Asian Textiles and Clothing Industries: the Second Migration of Production’, Textile Outlook International (September).Google Scholar
  10. Kruijtbosch, Martine, 1996. ‘Child and Adult Labor in the Export-Oriented Garment and Gem Polishing Industry of India’, Utrecht: India Committee of the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  11. Musiolek, Bettina. 1999. ‘Die Debatte um Verhaltenskodex und unabhängiges Monitoring: eine kritische Zwischenbilanz’, in Bettina Musiolek, ed.. Gezähmte Modemultis, Frankfurt a.M.: Brandes & Apsel.Google Scholar
  12. Rudnick, Anja. 1995. ‘The Thread of Life — Malaysia’s Textile Industry and the Plight of Bangladeshi Workers’, Masters Thesis at the Department of Human Geography, University of Amsterdam (December).Google Scholar
  13. Seyfang, Gill. 1999. ‘Private Sector Self-Regulation for Social Responsibility: Mapping Codes of Conduct’, School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
  14. SÜDWIND Institut fÜr Ökonomie und Ökumene. 2000. Das Kreuz mit dem Faden — Indonesierinnen nähen fÜr deutsche Modemultis. Siegburg: SÜDWIND.Google Scholar
  15. Yimprasert, Junya, Christopher Candland and Walden Bello. 1999. ‘Can Corporate Codes of Conduct Promote Labor Standards? Evidence from the Thai Footwear and Apparel Industries’, unpublished draft. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Christian Industrial Committee and Asia Monitor Resource Centre.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jedrzej George Frynas and Scott Pegg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jedrzej George Frynas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations