Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Heather Marquette
Chapter
  • 62 Downloads
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

This book started with two main questions. Firstly, if the Bank has long claimed that work on corruption was forbidden by its Articles of Agreement, how and why did it arrive at its current position? I have shown that it was the result of changes in both the theoretical and political environments, including a changing ideological climate following the end of the Cold War; external pressures from donor governments and NGOs; internal pressures from key Bank staff, especially its new president, James Wolfensohn; and also pragmatic institutional concerns.

Keywords

Civil Society General Counsel Bank Fund Popular Participation Political Conditionality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Huntington, S. (1968), Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shihata, I. (1991), The World Bank in a Changing World: Selected Essays (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers), p. 93.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tshuma, L. (1999), ‘The Political Economy of the World Bank’s Legal Framework for Economic Development’, Social and Legal Studies, 8 (1), pp. 83–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cox, R. W. (2000), ‘Political Economy and World Order: Problems of Power and Knowledge at the Millennium’, in Stubbs, R. and Underhill, G. (eds), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 29.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Thornburgh, R., Gainer, P. and Walker, C. (2000), ‘World Bank: Concerning Mechanisms to Address Problems of Fraud and Corruption’, report to Shengman Zhang, Managing Director and Chairman of the Oversight Committee on Fraud and Corruption, 21 January (rev.), (internal document), p. 36.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Korimbao, D. (2001), ‘World Bank Director Weise Expelled’, The National (PNG), 9 February.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    World Bank (2001), ‘Joint Statement by the Government of Papua New Guinea and the World Bank’, press release, 18 February.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    CBS News Worldwide (2000), ‘Philippines Corruption Trial Set’, Internet, 7 December, accessed 31 July 2001. Available at http://www.kyw.com/now/story/0,1597,255307–412,00.shtml.
  9. 10.
    World Bank (2000), ‘World Bank Statement on Allegations of Corruption Against High Public Officials in the Philippines’, press release No. 2000–4/EAP, 17 October.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    Integrated Regional Information Networks. (2001), ‘Kenya: Court Rules Anti-corruption Body “Illegal”’, Internet, 15 January, accessed 31 July 2001. Available at http://www.reliefweb.int/IRIN/cea/countrystories/kenya/20010115.phtml.
  11. 13.
    World Bank (1999), ‘Ugandan VP Defends Herself Against Mismanagement Claims’, Development News, 1 April.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Osike, F. (1999), ‘Museveni Backs VP Kazibwe and Blasts Ministers’, Internet, 25 November, accessed 31 July 2001. Available at http://www.ovpuganda.net/content/nandi/news/19992511.htm.

Copyright information

© Heather Marquette 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heather Marquette
    • 1
  1. 1.International Development DepartmentUniversity of BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations