Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Isao Miyaoka
Chapter
  • 45 Downloads
Part of the St Antony’s Series book series

Abstract

The final chapter conducts a cross-case analysis and posits revised propositions on conditions under which collective legitimization matters for norm adoption. I also briefly consider which mechanism of social influence was likely to operate in the cases of driftnet fishing and the ivory trade. Then, I note two limitations to these tentative conclusions: generalizability and insufficient attention to country variance in adoption. I also discuss two theoretical implications for international society and Japanese foreign policy. Finally, I describe recent developments of international trade in African elephant ivory and scientific whaling and make a few normative claims about the future of elephants and whales.

Keywords

Liberal Democratic Party Minke Whale African Elephant Political Obligation International Whaling Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Helmut Weidner, “Japanese Environmental Policy in an International Perspective: Lessons for a Preventive Approach,” p. 522, in Shigeto Tsuru and Helmut Weidner, eds, Environmental Policy in Japan (Berlin: Edition Sigma, 1989), pp. 479–552; Jonathan Holliman, “Environmentalism with a Global Scope,” p. 290, Japan Quarterly (July-September 1990), pp. 284–90; Alan S. Millar and Curtis Moore, Japan and the Global Environment (College Park: Center for Global Change, University of Maryland, 1991), pp. 18, 38; Hanns W. Maull, “Japan’s Global Environmental Policies,” pp. 366–8, 371, in Andrew Hurrell and Benedict Kingsbury, eds, The International Politics of the Environment (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), pp. 354–72; Miranda A. Schreurs, “Policy Laggard or Policy Leader?: Global Environmental Policy-Making Under the Liberal Democratic Party,” p. 31, The Journal of Pacific Asia, vol. 2 (1995), pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas Risse-Kappen, “Structures of Governance and Transnational Relations: What Have We Learned?” p. 291, in Thomas Risse-Kappen, ed., Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Stmctures and International Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 280–313. See also Jeffery T. Checkel, “Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 43 (1999), pp. 83–114.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim D. Reimann, “Building Networks from the Outside In: International Movements, Japanese NGOs, and the Kyoto Climate Change Conference,” prepared for delivery at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association (NPSA) and International Studies Association — Northeast (ISANE) (Philadelphia Crown Plaza Hotel, November 10–14, 1999).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See, for example, Karen T. Litfin, Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inis L. Claude, “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,” p. 379, International Organization, vol. 20 (1966), pp. 367–79.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinhard Drifte, Japans Quest for a Permanent Security Council Seat: A Matter of Pride or Justice? (New York: St. Martin’s Press, now Palgrave, 2000), pp. 120–1. In 1993, Japan officially started to seek permanent membership on the United Nations Security Council. Reinhard Drifte, Japans Foreign Policy in the 1990s: From Economic Super Power to What Power? (Basingstoke: Macmillan, now Palgrave, 1996), pp. 131–5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    For “crucial-case studies,” see Harry Eckstein, “Case Study and Theory in Political Science,” in Fred I. Green and Nelson Polsby, eds, Handbook of Political Science Volume 7: Strategies of inquiry (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975), pp. 79–137.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karen A. Mingst and Margaret P. Karns, The United Nations in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd edn. (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 2000), p. 1.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miguel Marin-Bosch, Votes in the UN General Assembly (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998), pp. 110, 183–5, 195–200. The resolutions without a vote account for 56 percent of the total, those without negative votes 17 percent, and those with four or more negative votes 15 percent. For a recent account of voting alignments in the General Assembly, see Soo Yeon Kim and Bruce Russett, “The New Politics of Voting Alignments in the United Nations General Assembly,” International Organization, vol. 50, no. 4 (1996), pp. 629–52.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    For problems with the United Nations’ standard setting, see Adam Roberts and Benedict Kingsbury, “Introduction: The UN’s Roles in International Society since 1945,” pp. 52–6, in Adam Roberts and Benedict Kingsbury, eds, United Nations, Divided World: The UNs Roles in International Relations, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    James N. Rosenau and Ernst-Otto Czempiel, eds, Governance without Government: Orderand Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th edn. (New York: Alfred a Knopf, 1978), p. 231.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Joseph S. Nye, Bound toLead: The ChangingNature ofAmericanPower (New York: Basic Books, 1990), p. 32.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    The White House, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (Washington, DC, September 2002).Google Scholar
  15. 22.
    Kent E. Calder, “Japanese Foreign Economic Policy Formation,” World Politics, vol. 40, no. 4 (July 1988), pp. 517–41.Google Scholar
  16. 23.
    Robert M. Orr, The Emergence of/apans Foreign Aid Power (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990); Kenneth B. Pyle, The Japanese Question (Washington, DC: The AEI Press, 1992), pp. 111–13; Yumiko Mikanagi, Japans Trade Policy: Action or Reaction? (London: Routledge, 1996); Taniguchi Masaki, Nihon no taibei boeki kosh8 [The US-Japan Trade Relationship: Its Structure and Transfiguration] (Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, 1997); Peter J. Katzenstein, Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Militwy in Postwar Japan (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996); Leonard J. Schoppa, Bargaining with Japan: What American Pressure Can and Cannot Do (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997); Amy Gurowitz, “Mobilizing International Norms: Domestic Actors, Immigrants, and the Japanese State,” World Politics, vol. 51 (April 1999), pp. 413–45. Note that Leonard Schoppa focuses on the procedural legitimacy of coercive strategies. Leonard J. Schoppa, “The Social Context in Coercive International Bargaining,” International Organization, vol. 53, no. 2 (1999), pp. 307–42.Google Scholar
  17. 25.
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Fisheries Division, “KOkai nagashiami gyogyo mondai” [High Seas Driftnet Fishing Issue], (Tokyo, June 18, 1992), p. 2; Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Fisheries Division, “Kankyo to gyogyo mondai” [Environment and Fishing Issue], (Tokyo, December 3, 1992), pp. 5, 8; Nihon keizai shinbun (November 4, 1992), p. 3.Google Scholar
  18. 27.
    Michael A. O’Connell and Michael Sutton in cooperation with TRAFFIC USA, The Effects of Trade Moratoria on International Commerce in African Elephant Ivory: A Preliminary Report (Washington, DC: WWF and the Conservation Foundation, June 1990), pp. ii, 8–10; Nihon keizai shinbun (April 2, 1991), p. 35; Yomiuri shinbun (March 8, 1990), p. 30; Yomiuri shinbun (January 16, 1990), p. 27; Yomiuri shinbun (April 12, 1990), p. 30.Google Scholar
  19. 30.
    Kiyono Hisako, “Washinton joyaku dai 10 kai teiyakukoku kaigi hokoku” [Report on the 10th CITES Conference of the Parties], WWF, vol. 27 (Tokyo, November 1997), pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  20. 38.
    Milton M. R. Freeman, “Science and Trans-science in the Whaling Debate,” p. 144, in Milton M. R. Freeman and Urs P. Kreuter, eds, Elephants and Whales: Resources for Whom? (Basel, Switzerland: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1994), pp. 143–57.Google Scholar
  21. 39.
    This editorial was supported in a letter to the editor from the Embassy of Japan in London. The Independent (May 30, 1990). For other similar editorials, see The Times Uuly 3, 1990) and The Times (May 29, 1991).Google Scholar
  22. 40.
    Peter J. Stoett, The International Politics of Whaling (Vancouver: UBC Press, 1997), p. 130.Google Scholar
  23. 41.
    Raymond Bonner, At the Hand of Man: Peril and Hope for Africas Wildlife (New York: Vintage, 1994), p. 110.Google Scholar
  24. 43.
    Urs P. Kreuter and Randy T. Simmons, “Economics, Politics and Controversy over African Elephant Conservation,” p. 53, in Milton M. R. Freeman and Urs P. Kreuter, eds, Elephants and Whales: Resources for Whom? (Basel, Switzerland: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1994), pp. 39–57. For a similar argument, see also Edward B. Barbier, Joanne C. Burgess, Timothy M. Swanson, and David W. Pearce, Elephants, Economics and Ivory (London: Earthscan, 1990).Google Scholar
  25. 45.
    Thomas Princen, “The Ivory Trade Ban: NGOs and International Conservation,” p. 130, in Thomas Princen and Matthias Finger, Environmental NGOs in World Politics (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 121–59.Google Scholar
  26. 46.
    Asahi shinbun (October 18, 1989), p. 3; Yomiuri shinbun (October 19, 1989), p. 7; (October 31, 1989), p. 34.Google Scholar
  27. 47.
    Mainichi shinbun (December 27, 1989, evening edition), p. 1; Japan Times (December 29, 1989).Google Scholar
  28. 48.
    Suisan Nenkan Henshu Iinkai, ed., Suisan nenkan 1989 [Fisheries Yearbook 1989] (Tokyo: Suisansha, 1989), p. 23.Google Scholar
  29. 49.
    Arne Kalland and Brian Moeran, Japanese Whaling: End of an Era (London: Curzon Press, 1992), p. 41.Google Scholar
  30. 50.
    Mizuguchi Kenya, “Umi to kujira eno kakawarikata no tayosei to suisanshigen” [Variety in Relationship with Ocean and the Whale and Fisheries Resources], pp. 73–4, in Kitahara Takeshi, ed., Kujira ni manabu [Learning from Whales] (Tokyo: Naruyamado Shoten, 1996), pp. 63–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Isao Miyaoka 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isao Miyaoka
    • 1
  1. 1.Osaka University of Foreign StudiesJapan

Personalised recommendations