Advertisement

Taking Religious and Cultural Pluralism Seriously

The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Society
  • Scott M. Thomas
Chapter
  • 91 Downloads
Part of the Culture and Religion in International Relations book series (CRIR)

Abstract

The Western culture of modernity and the institutions of international society embedded in it are being challenged by the global resurgence of religion and cultural pluralism in international relations. This resurgence is part of the larger crisis of modernity. It reflects a deeper and more widespread disillusionment with a “modernity” that reduces the world to what can be perceived and controlled through reason, science, technology, and bureaucratic rationality, and leaves out considerations of the religious, the spiritual, or the sacred. In the second instance, the global resurgence of religion is the result of the failure of the modernizing, secular state to produce both democracy and development in the Third World. This failure became evident by subsequent “political decay”—the decline of politics into authoritarianism, patrimonialism, and corruption since the late 196os—and by “political collapse”—the disintegration of some states, particularly in Africa, since the late 198os.2 Dissatisfaction with the project of the postcolonial secular state and the conflict between religious nationalism and secular nationalism was one of the most important developments in Third World politics in the 1990s.3

Keywords

International Society International Relation International Order Common Culture Cultural Pluralism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    G. K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1996 [1908] ), 17–18.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Mark Juergensmeyer, The New Cold War: Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State ( Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1993 )Google Scholar
  3. Jeff Haynes, Religion in Third World Politics ( London: Open University Press, 1994Google Scholar
  4. David Westerlund, ed., Questioning the Secular State: The Worldwide Resurgence of Religion in Politics ( London: I. B. Tauris, 1996 ).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robert Lee, Overcoming Tradition and Modernity: The Search for Islamic Authenticity ( Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997 ).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. N. Eisenstadt, “The Reconstruction of Religious Arenas in the Framework of ‘Multiple Modernities,”’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29, no. 3 (2000): 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 11.
    Martin Wight, International Theory: The Three Traditions ( Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1991 ), 13–15.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    Robert H. Jackson, “The Political Theory of International Society” in International Relations Theory Today, eds. Ken Booth and Steve Smith (Oxford: Polity Press, 1995 )Google Scholar
  9. Robert H. Jackson, “Pluralism in International Political Theory,” Review of International Studies 18, no. 3 (1992): 271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 22.
    Roland Robertson, “Globalization and the Future of Traditional Religion,” in Religion and the Powers of the Common Life: God and Globalization, vol. 1, eds. Max L. Stackhouse and Peter J. Paris ( Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2000 ).Google Scholar
  11. 23.
    Roger Epp, “The English School on the Frontiers of International Society: A Hermeneutic Recollection,” Review of International Studies 24, no. 3 (1998): 47–63.Google Scholar
  12. 24.
    David R. Mapel and Terry Nardin, eds., International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998 ).Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    Adam Watson, “Hedley Bull, States Systems and International Societies,” Review of International Studies 13, no. 1 (1987): 147–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 26.
    B. A. Roberson, ed., International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory ( London: Pinter, 1998Google Scholar
  15. Timothy Dunne, Inventing International Society: A History of the English School ( Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 27.
    Taking Religious and Cultural Pluralism Seriously 49Google Scholar
  17. Timothy Dunne, “The Social Construction of International Society,” European Journal of International Relations 1, no. 3 (1995): 367–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 31.
    Erik Ringmar, Identity, Interest, and Action: A Cultural Explanation of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 32.
    Adda Bozeman, The Future of Law in a Multicultural World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971), ix.Google Scholar
  20. 37.
    Alasdair Maclntyre, “How Can We Learn What Veritatis Spendor Has to Teach?” The Thomist 58, no. 2 (1994): 171–95.Google Scholar
  21. 41.
    Michael Donelan, Elements of International Political Theory ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990 ), 38–55.Google Scholar
  22. 43.
    Martin Wight, Systems of States ( Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977 ), 21–45.Google Scholar
  23. 44.
    Nicholas J. Rengger, “Culture, Society, and Order in World Politics,” in Dilemmas of World Politics, eds. John Baylis and Nicholas J. Rengger ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992 ).Google Scholar
  24. 58.
    Alexander Wendt, ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It,’ in International Theory: Critical Investigations, ed. James der Derian (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995 ).Google Scholar
  25. 59.
    Alexander Wendt and Daniel Friedheim, “Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State,” International Organization 49, no. 3 (1995): 689–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 72.
    Stephen Chan, “Hans Kling and a Global Ethic,” Review of International Studies 25, no. 3 (1999): 525–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 74.
    Jean Bethke Elshtain, “Really Existing Communities,” Review of International Studies 25, no. I (1999): 141–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pavlos Hatzopoulos and Fabio Petito 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott M. Thomas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations