International Liberalism: Peace through Principles?

  • Félix E. Martín


Liberalism is not a specific and straightforward prescription for the promotion and maintenance of international peace. In fact, its main focus was originally the political and economic organization of domestic society for the realization and protection of the liberty of the individual. Nonetheless, several of its original and basic principles have been extended to the analysis and explanation of the outbreak, evolution, and permanence of peace in the interstate system.


World Politics International Politics Individual Liberty International Peace Economic Interdependence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Guido de Ruggiero, The History of European Liberalism, trans. R. G. Collingwood (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927);Google Scholar
  2. J. S. Schapiro, Liberalism: Its Meaning and History (Princeton: Van Nostrand Press, 1958);Google Scholar
  3. Roberto Mangabeira Unger, Knowledge and Politics (New York: Free Press, 1984);Google Scholar
  4. David John Manning, Liberalism (London: Dent Press, 1976);Google Scholar
  5. Harry K. Girvetz, The Evolution of Liberalism, rev. ed. (New York: Collier Books, 1966).Google Scholar
  6. 2.
    Maurice Cranston, “Liberalism,” in Paul Edwards, eds., The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vols. 3 and 4 (New York: Macmillan, and Free Press, 1967), pp. 458–461;Google Scholar
  7. David G. Smith, “Liberalism,” in David L. Sills, ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (New York: Macmillan, and Free Press, 1968), vol. 9, pp. 276–282.Google Scholar
  8. 3.
    Charles W. Anderson, Pragmatic Liberalism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990);Google Scholar
  9. Stephen L. Newman, Liberalism at Wits’ End: The Libertarian Revolt Against the Modern State (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  10. 4.
    E. H. Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939 (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1964), pp. 11–62;Google Scholar
  11. Robert O. Keohane, “International Liberalism Reconsidered,” in John Dunn, ed., The Economic Limits to Modern Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 174.Google Scholar
  12. 5.
    Michael W. Doyle, Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997), pp. 205–314.Google Scholar
  13. 6.
    Edward L. Morse, Modernization and the Transformation of International Relations (New York: Free Press, 1976), pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
  14. 7.
    Giovanni Sartori, The Theory of Democracy Revisited (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1987), vol. 2, p. 380.Google Scholar
  15. 9.
    Robert Gilpin, U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment (New York: Basic Books, 1975), p. 25.Google Scholar
  16. 11.
    Joseph A. Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis, 11 th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), p. 394.Google Scholar
  17. 13.
    Stanley Hoffmann, “Liberalism and International Affairs,” in Stanley Hoffman, Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1987), p. 396 and in pp. 396–405.Google Scholar
  18. 14.
    Charles W. Kegley, Jr., “The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 2 (June 1993), pp. 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 15.
    John H. Herz, Political Realism and Political Idealism (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1951);Google Scholar
  20. Charles W. Kegley, Jr., “Neo-Idealism: A Practical Matter,” Ethics and International Affairs, vol. 2 (1988), pp. 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 16.
    Woodrow Wilson, “The Fourteen Points Address,” reprinted in Ruhl J. Bartlett, ed., The Record of American Diplomacy: Documents and Readings in the History of American Foreign Relations, 3rd ed. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1954), pp. 459–461.Google Scholar
  22. Alexander DeConde, A History of American Foreign Policy, 3rd ed. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1978), vol. II, pp. 60–61.Google Scholar
  23. 19.
    Michael W. Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part I,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3 (Summer 1983), pp. 206–207.Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    Michael W. Doyle, “Liberalism and World Politics,” American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 4 (December 1986), p. 1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 28.
    Karl Friedrich, Inevitable Peace (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1948);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. F. H. Hinsley, Power and the Pursuit of Peace (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967), chapter 4;Google Scholar
  27. W. B. Gallie, Philosophers of Peace and War (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978), chapter 1;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenneth N. Waltz, “Kant, Liberalism, and War,” The American Political Science Review, vol. 56, no. 2 (June 1962), pp. 331–340;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pierre Hassner, “Immanuel Kant,” in Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey, eds., History of Political Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company, 1972), pp. 554–593.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Michael W. Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part II,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 4 (Fall 1983), pp. 323–326.Google Scholar
  31. 32.
    Bruce M. Russett, Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    Jack S. Levy, “Domestic Politics and War,” in Robert I. Rotberg and Theodore K. Rabb, eds., The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 88.Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    Zeev Maoz and Bruce M. Russett, “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986,” American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 3 (September 1993), p. 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 35.
    Bruce M. Russett, Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 36.
    Carol R. Ember, Melvin Ember, and Bruce M. Russett, “Peace Between Participatory Polities: A Cross-Cultural Test of the ‘Democracies Rarely Fight Each Other’ Hypothesis,” World Politics, vol. 44, no. 4 (July 1992), p. 574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 37.
    Melvin Small and J. David Singer, “The War-Proneness of Democratic Regimes, 1816–1965,” The Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, vol. 1, no. 4 (Summer 1976), pp. 54–55;Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    Randall L. Schweller, “Domestic Structure and Preventive War: Are Democracies More Pacific?” World Politics, vol. 44, no. 2 (January 1992), p. 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 39.
    David A. Lake, “Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War,” American Political Science Review, vol. 86, no. 1 (March 1992), p. 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 40.
    Dean V. Babst, “A Force for Peace,” Industrial Research, vol. 14 (April 1972), pp. 55–58;Google Scholar
  40. Rudolph J. Rummel, “The Freedom Factor,” Reason, vol. 15 (July 1983), pp. 32–38;Google Scholar
  41. Rudolph J. Rummel, Understanding Conflict and War, 2 vols. (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1976);Google Scholar
  42. Rudolph J. Rummel, “Libertarianism and International Violence,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 27, no. 1 (March 1983), pp. 27–71;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harvey Starr, “Democracy and War: Choice, Learning and Security Communities,” Journal of Peace Research, vol. 29, no. 2 (1992), pp. 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 41.
    Quincy Wright, Study of War (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1942), p. 841.Google Scholar
  45. Steve Chan, “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall … Are The Freer Countries More Pacific?” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 28, no. 4 (December 1984), pp. 641–644;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Erich Weede, “Democracy and War Involvement,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 28, no. 4 (December 1984), p. 660;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zeev Maoz and Nasrin Abdolali, “Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816–1976,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 33, no. 1 (March 1989), pp. 31–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 44.
    William J. Dixon, “Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict,” American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 1 (March 1994), pp. 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. T. Clifton Morgan and Sally Howard Campbell, “Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints, and War,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 35, no. 2 (June 1991), pp. 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 47.
    Brian M. Pollins, “Does Trade Still Follow the Flag,” American Political Science Review, vol. 83, no. 2 (June 1989), pp. 465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Brian M. Pollins, “Conflict, Cooperation, and Commerce: The Effect of International Political Interactions on Bilateral Trade Flows,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 33, no. 3 (August 1989), pp. 737–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 48.
    Baron de Montesquieu, trans. Thomas Nugent The Spirit of the Laws (New York: Hafner Press, A Division of Macmillan, 1949), book XX, chapter II, p. 316.Google Scholar
  53. Baron de Montesquieu, De l’Esprit des Lois (Paris: Editions Garnier Frères, 1956), vol. II, book XX, chapter II, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  54. 49.
    J. B. Condliffe, The Commerce of Nations (New York: W. W. Norton, 1950);Google Scholar
  55. Robert Gilpin, The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987);Google Scholar
  56. Robert Gilpin, Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001);Google Scholar
  57. Albert O. Hirschman, National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, expanded ed. (Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1980);Google Scholar
  58. Jacob Viner, Studies in the Theory of International Trade (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1937);Google Scholar
  59. Jacob Viner, International Trade and Economic Development (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1952);Google Scholar
  60. Jacob Viner, The Long View and The Short One: Studies in Economic Theory and Policy (New York: Free Press, 1958);Google Scholar
  61. Jacob Viner, “Power Versus Plenty As Objectives of Foreign Policy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries,” World Politics, vol. I, no. 1 (October 1948), pp. 1–29;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Charles Wilson, Profit and Power: A Study of England and the Dutch Wars (New York: Longmans, Green, 1957).Google Scholar
  63. 52.
    John Stuart Mill, Principles of Political Economy with Some of their Applications to Social Philosophy, from the 5th London ed. (New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1864), vol. II, book III, chapter XVII, p. 136. Emphasis added.Google Scholar
  64. 53.
    Richard N. Garner, Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy: The Origins and Prospects of Our International Economic Order (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  65. 54.
    Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston: Little, Brown, 1977), pp. 24–29Google Scholar
  66. 55.
    Barry Buzan, “Economic Structure and International Security: The Limits of the Liberal Case,” International Organization, vol. 38, no. 4 (Autumn 1984), pp. 597–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 56.
    Richard Rosecrance, The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World (New York: Basic Books, 1986).Google Scholar
  68. 57.
    Salomon W. Polachek, “Conflict and Trade,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 24, no. 1 (March 1980), pp. 55–78;Google Scholar
  69. Salomon W. Polachek, “Conflict and Trade: An Economics Approach to Political International Interactions,” in Walter Isard and C. Anderton, eds., Economics of Arms Reduction and the Peace Process (Amsterdant: North-Holland, 1992), pp. 89–120;Google Scholar
  70. Mark Gasiorowski and Salomon W. Polachek, “Conflict and Interdependence: East-West Trade and Linkages in the Era of Detente,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 26, no. 4 (December 1982), pp. 709–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 59.
    Hugo Grotius, The Law of War and Peace, trans. Louise R. Pacis (Roslyn, NY: Walter J. Black, 1949).Google Scholar
  72. 60.
    Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977), pp. 26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hedley Bull, “The Grotian Conception of International Society,” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight, eds., Diplomatic Investigations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966), pp. 51–73.Google Scholar
  74. 61.
    Stephen D. Krasner, “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes As Intervening Variables,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2 (Spring 1982), pp. 185–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 62.
    Robert O. Keohane, International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989), p. 1.Google Scholar
  76. 64.
    Robert Jervis, “Security Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2 (Spring 1982), pp. 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Neta C. Crawford, “A Security Regime Among Democracies: Cooperation Among Iroquois Nations,” International Organization, vol. 48, no. 3 (Summer 1994), pp. 345–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 65.
    Harold K. Jacobson, Networks of Interdependence: International Organizations and the Global Political System (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1979), p. 206Google Scholar
  79. Inis L. Claude, Jr., Swords Into Plowshares: The Problem and Process of International Organization, 4th ed. (New York: Random House, 1984), p. 216.Google Scholar
  80. 67.
    Ernst B. Haas, Robert L. Butterworth, and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Conflict Management by International Organizations (Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, 1972), pp. 48–61.Google Scholar
  81. Ernst B. Haas, “The Collective Management of International Conflict, 1945–1984,” in United Nations Institute for Training and Research, ed., The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security (Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987), pp. 3–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Félix E. Martín 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Félix E. Martín

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations