Advertisement

Conclusion: Management Theory in Crisis

  • Jean-Etienne JoulliéEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

The quest for management theory started in earnest at the dawn of the twentieth century. Its goal is to make management a reliable undertaking, leading to predictable results. Disagreement exists about the research framework best suited to this pursuit. However, except for postmodern authors, management researchers assume the existence of stable and causally effective structures underpinning organizational life. Such an existence implies a deterministic picture of human agency. Equivocations, ambiguities, tautologies, and imprecise language obfuscate this implication, hollowing out management theory of its performative quality. A century after its inception, the quest for management theory has failed. Other avenues for management scholarship exist.

Keywords

Management theory Research paradigm Positivism Postmodernism Determinism 

References

  1. AACSB (n.d.). http://www.aacsb.edu/about/mission. Accessed 09 Nov 2017
  2. Adler PS, Forbes LC, Willmott H (2007) Critical management studies. Acad Manag Ann 1:119–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvesson M, Willmott H (eds) (1992) Critical management studies. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreski S (1969) The uses of comparative sociology. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  5. Ansoff I (1965) Corporate strategy. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Baritz L (1960) The servants of power. Wesleyan University Press, MiddletownCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnard CI (1968) The functions of the executive (Andrews KR intr.). Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartone BT, Eid J, Johnsen BJ, Laberg JC, Snook SA (2009) Big five personality factors, hardiness, and social judgment as predictors of leader performance. Leadersh Org Dev J 30(6):498–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartunek JM, Rynes SR (2010) The construction and contributions of “implications for practice”: what’s in them and what might they offer? Acad Manag Learn Educ 9(1):100–117Google Scholar
  10. BCG (2013) BCG HISTORY: 1965, www.bcg.com/about_bcg/history/history_1965.aspx. Accessed 01 Feb 2018
  11. Beer S (1968) Management science: the business use of operations research. Doubleday, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Berkowitz L, Lutterman KG (1968) The traditional social responsible personality. Public Opin Q 32(2):169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blackburn S (2005) The Oxford dictionary of philosophy, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Blau PM (1963) The dynamics of bureaucracy: study of interpersonal relations in two government agencies. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Bogen J (2017) Theory and observation in science. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/science-theory-observation/. Accessed 05 Feb 2018
  16. Boisot M, McKelvey B (2010) Integrating modernist and postmodernist perspectives on organizations: a complexity science bridge. Acad Manag Rev 35(3):415–433Google Scholar
  17. Boje DM, Gephart RP, Thatchenkery TJ (eds) (1996) Postmodern management and organization theory. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  18. Buono AF, Bowditch JL (2003) The human side of mergers and acquisitions: managing collisions between people, culture, and organizations. BeardBooks, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. Burrell G, Morgan G (1979) Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Ashgate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Bygrave W (1989) The entrepreneurship paradigm (I): a philosophical look at its research methodologies. Entrep Theory Pract 14(1):7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christensen CM, Raynor ME (2003) Why hard-nosed executives should care about management theory. Harv Bus Rev 81(9):66–74Google Scholar
  22. Clarke R (2009) Dispositions, abilities to act, and free will: the new dispositionalism. Mind 118(470):323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clegg SR, Ross-Smith A (2003) Revising the boundaries: management education and learning in a postpositivist world. Acad Manag Learn Edu 2(1):85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. CUPA-HR (2016) Tenured/Tenure-Track Faculty Unweighted Average Salaries by 2-Digit Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) Discipline, Academic Rank, and Affiliation. https://www.cupahr.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/FHE-2016-2-Digit-Average-Salaries-Tenured-and-Tenure-Track.pdf. Accessed on 13-March 2018
  25. Deetz S (1996) Describing differences in approaches to organization science: rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organ Sci 7(2):191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dew K (2014) Structural functionalism. In: Cockerham WC, Dingwall R, Quah S (eds) The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Donaldson L (1996) For positivist organization theory. SAGE, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Donaldson L (2003) A critique of postmodernism in organizational studies. Res Sociol Organ 21:169–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Drucker PF (1986) Management: tasks, responsibilities, practices. Truman Talley Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Durkheim É (2002) On suicide (Simpson G ed, Spaulding JA & Simpson G trans.). Routledge Classics, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Fournier V, Grey C (2000) At the critical moment: conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Hum Relat 53:7–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gellner E (1970) Concepts and society. In: Emmet D, MacIntyre A (eds) Sociological theory and philosophical analysis. The Macmillan Company, New York, pp 115–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gellner E (1986) Relativism and the social sciences. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. George G (2014) Rethinking management scholarship. Acad Manag J 57(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ghoshal S (2005) Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad Manag Learn Edu 4(1):75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Giddens A (2000) Capitalism and modern social theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Giedymin J (1975) Antipositivism in contemporary philosophy of social science and humanities. Br J Philos Sci 26(4):275–301. https://www.jstor.org/stable/686676?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
  38. Gioia DA, Pitre E (1990) Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Acad Manag Rev 15(4):584–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Griffin RW, Moorhead G (2012) Organizational behavior: managing people and organizations, 10th edn. South Western, Cengage Learning, MasonGoogle Scholar
  40. Hassard J (1994) Postmodern organizational analysis: toward a conceptual framework. J Manag Stud 31(3):303–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hassard J, Cox JW (2013) Can sociological paradigms still inform organizational analysis? A paradigm model for post-paradigm times. Organ Stud 34(11):1701–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson P, Duberley J (2000) Understanding management research: an introduction to epistemology. SAGE, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Joullié J-E, Spillane R (2015) The philosophical foundations of management thought. Lexington Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Kartono K, Hilmiana H, Muizu WOZ (2017) Personality and organisational politics on employees performance: studies at local government enterprises of people credit bank in West Java region III. Int J Bus Glob 18(4):524–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Khurana R (2007) From higher aims to hired hands: the social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  46. Khurana R, Spender JC (2012) Herbert A. Simon on what ails business schools: more than ‘a problem in organizational design’. J Manag Stud 49(3):619–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kiechel W (2010) The lords of strategy: the secret intellectual history of the new corporate world. Harvard Business Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  48. Kiechel W (2012) The management century. Harv Bus Rev 90(11):62–75Google Scholar
  49. Kingsbury N, Scanzoni J (2009) Structural-functionalism. In: Boss P, Doherty WJ, LaRossa R, Schumm WR, Steinmetz SK (eds) Sourcebook of family theories and methods. Springer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  50. Kolakowski L (1969) The alienation of reason: a history of positivist thought (Guterman N trans.). Anchor Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Koontz H (1961) The management theory jungle. J Acad Manag 4(3):174–188Google Scholar
  52. Koontz H (1980) The management theory jungle revisited. Acad Manag Rev 5(2):175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Koss Hartmann R (2014) Subversive functionalism: for a less canonical critique in critical management studies. Hum Relat 67(5):611–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lakomski G, Evers CW (2011) Analytic philosophy and organization theory: philosophical problems and scientific solutions. In: Tsoukas H, Chia R (eds) Philosophy and organization theory. Res Sociol Organ. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley. 32:23–54. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0733-558X(2011)0000032004/full/html
  55. Lanchester FW (1956) Mathematics in warfare. In: Newman J (ed) The world of mathematics, vol 4. Simon & Chuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Lévi-Strauss C (1963) Structural anthropology (Jacobson C & Schoepf BG trans.). Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Locke R (1989) Management and higher education since 1940. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Locke KD (2001) Grounded theory in management research. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Lyotard J-F (1984) The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge (Bennington G & Massumi B trans.). The University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  60. Mayo E (2007) The human problems of an industrial civilization. In: Thompson K (ed) The early sociology of management and organizations, vol VI. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. McRae RR, Costa PT (1996) Toward a new generation of personality theories: theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In: Wiggins JS (ed) The five-factor model of personality: theoretical perspectives. Guilford Press, New York, pp 51–87Google Scholar
  62. Morgenbesser S (1970) Is it a science? In: Emmet D, MacIntyre A (eds) Sociological theory and philosophical analysis. The Macmillan Company, New York, pp 20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Oldham GR, Anne Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Acad Manag J 39(3):607–634Google Scholar
  64. Pearce J, Huang L (2012) The decreasing value of our research to management education. Acad Manag Learn Educ 11(2):247–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pfeffer J (1982) Organizations and organization theory. Pitman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  66. Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2006) Evidence-based management. Harv Bus Rev 84(1):62–75Google Scholar
  67. Popper KR (2004) Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Powell TC (2001) Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations. Strateg Manag J 22:875–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Powell TC (2002) The philosophy of strategy. Strateg Manag J 23:873–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Priem RL, Butler JE (2001a) Is the resource-based theory a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad Manag Rev 26(1):22–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Priem RL, Butler JE (2001b) Tautology in the resource-based view and implications of externally determined resource value: further comments. Acad Manag Rev 26(1):57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Radcliffe-Brown AR (1940) On social structure. J R Anthropol Inst G B Irel 70(1):1–12Google Scholar
  75. Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ (1934) Management and the worker: an account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne works, Chicago. Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  76. Rojas F (2010) Power through institutional work: acquiring academic authority in the 1968 third world strike. Acad Manag J 53(6):1263–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rousseau DM, McCarthy S (2007) Educating managers from an evidence-based perspective. Acad Manag Learn Edu 6:84–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shapira Z (2011) “I’ve got a theory paper – do you?”: conceptual, empirical, and theoretical contributions to knowledge in the organizational sciences. Organ Sci 22(5):1312–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  80. Simon HA (1997) Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Skinner Q (1981) Machiavelli. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  82. Smith A (2007) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. MetaLibri, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  83. Snyder TD, de Brey C, Dillow SA (2018) Digest of education statistics 2016. U.S. Department of Education, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  84. Spillane R, Martin J (2005) Personality and performance. UNSW Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  85. Su W, Tsang EWK (2015) Product diversification and financial performance: the moderating role of secondary stakeholders. Acad Manag J 58(4):1128–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sulkowski L (2010) Two paradigms in management epistemology. J Int Manag 2(1):109–119Google Scholar
  87. Sutton RI, Staw BM (1995) What theory is not. Adm Sci Q 40:371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Taylor FW (1919) The principles of scientific management. Harper and Brothers Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. Tomey AM (2009) Nursing management and leadership, 8th edn. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  90. Watson TJ (2003) Sociology, work and industry, 4th edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  91. Watson TJ (2017) Sociology, work and industry, 7th edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  92. Weber M (1969) The theory of social and economic organisation (Henderson AM & Parsons T trans.). Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  93. Whitley R (1984) The fragmented state of management studies. Reasons and consequences. J Manag Stud 21(3):331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wicks AC, Freeman RE (1998) Organization studies and the new pragmatism: positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organ Sci 9(2):123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wren DA (2004) The evolution of management thought. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  96. Wren DA, Bedeian AG (2009) The evolution of management thought, 6th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  97. Wren DA, Greenwood RG (1998) Management innovators. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gulf University for Science and TechnologyHawallyKuwait
  2. 2.Université LavalQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations