Advertisement

Measurement Technology for Precision Machines

  • Shuming YangEmail author
  • Changsheng Li
  • Guofeng Zhang
Reference work entry
  • 24 Downloads
Part of the Precision Manufacturing book series (PRECISION)

Abstract

wThe precision of machine tools is the foundation of machining to achieve high precision. Therefore, an investigation on the measurement technology for precision machines is extremely important for precision/ultraprecision machining. This chapter provides an overall introduction to the measurement of precision machines, including the precision along linear axes and rotary axes, e.g., the precision of length, precision of angle, straightness, squareness, parallelism, flatness, and runout. The basic principles, achievable accuracy, application, and characteristics of a wide variety of measurement methods and instruments with precision in the nanoscale or below are discussed. It is found that digitization, automation, and flexibility are the development trends of modern instruments used for the measurement of precision machine tools. Though a number of measurement methods have been developed during these years, the existed methods face challenges to comprehensively characterize the performance of machine tools, especially for ultraprecision machine tools with a precision better than 100 nm. In addition, online measurement still remains to be investigated to improve the performance of precision machining.

Keywords

Measurement Metrology Online measurement Machine tool Precision machining 

References

  1. Airy GB (1846) On the flexure of a uniform bar supported by a number of equal pressures applied at equidistant points, and on the positions proper for the applications of these pressures in order to prevent any sensible alteration of the length of the bar by small flexure. Mem R Astron Soc 15:157ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Anandan KP, Ozdoganlar OB (2016) A multi-orientation error separation technique for spindle metrology of miniature ultra-high-speed spindles. Precis Eng 43:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bangert M (2009) Easier error compensation: volumetric error compensation technology shortens and simplifies the calibration process. Quality 48(2):30–32Google Scholar
  4. Beno M, Zvoncan M, Kovac M, Peterka J (2013) Circular interpolation and positioning accuracy deviation measurement on five axis machine tools with different structures/Mjerenje devijacija tocnosti kruzne interpolacije i pozicioniranja na petoosnim alatnim strojevima razlicitih konstrukcija. Tehnicki Vjesn-Tech Gaz 20(3):479–485Google Scholar
  5. Bryan JB (1979) The Abbe principle revisited: an updated interpretation. Precis Eng 1(3):129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapman P (1985) A capacitance based ultra-precision spindle error analyser. Precis Eng 7(3):129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Giacomo B, de Magalhães RDCA, Paziani FT (2004) Reversal technique applied to the measurement of straightness errorsGoogle Scholar
  8. Donaldson RR (1972) Simple method for separating spindle error from test ball roundness error. California Univ., Lawrence Livermore Lab, LivermoreGoogle Scholar
  9. Espinosa OC, Diaz P, Baca MC, Allison BN, Shilling KM (2008) Comparison of calibration methods for a surface plate. Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), AlbuquerqueGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans CJ, Hocken RJ, Estler WT (1996) Self-calibration: reversal, redundancy, error separation, and ‘absolute testing’. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 45(2):617–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan K-C, Wang H, Shiou F-J, Ke C-W (2004) Design analysis and applications of a 3D laser ball bar for accuracy calibration of multiaxis machines. J Manuf Syst 23(3):194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frennberg M, Sacconi A (1996) International comparison of high-accuracy roundness measurements. Metrologia 33(6):539ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grejda R, Marsh E, Vallance R (2005) Techniques for calibrating spindles with nanometer error motion. Precis Eng 29(1):113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO. 230-1:1996, Test code for machine tools. Part 1. Geometric accuracy of machines operating under no-load or finishing conditions. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. ISO. 230-7:2006(E), Test code for machine tools. Part 7. Geometric accuracy of axes of rotation. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  16. Janeczko J, Griffin B, Wang C (2000) Laser vector measurement technique for the determination and compensation of volumetric position errors. Part II: experimental verification. Rev Sci Instrum 71(10):3938–3941ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jia MQ, Zhang J, Gao R, Zhao D-S, Peng T-T (2015) Precision measurement of squareness of large rectangular square. In: Paper presented at the ninth international symposium on precision engineering measurement and instrumentationGoogle Scholar
  18. Józwik J, Czwarnowski M (2015) Angular positioning accuracy of rotary table and repeatability of five-axis machining centre DMU 65 MonoBLOCK. Adv Sci Technol Res J 9(28):89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim W-S, Raman S (2000) On the selection of flatness measurement points in coordinate measuring machine inspection. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(3):427–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kwaśny W, Turek P, Jędrzejewski J (2011) Survey of machine tool error measuring methods. J Mach Eng 11Google Scholar
  21. Marsh E, Couey J, Vallance R (2006) Nanometer-level comparison of three spindle error motion separation techniques. J Manuf Sci Eng 128(1):180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meijer J, Heuvelman C (1990) Accuracy of surface plate measurements – general purpose software for flatness measurement. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 39(1):545–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakazawa H (1994) Principles of precision engineering. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Parkinson S, Longstaff A, Crampton A, Gregory P (2012) The application of automated planning to machine tool calibration. In: Paper presented at the ICAPSGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmitz T, Ziegert J (2000) Dynamic evaluation of spatial CNC contouring accuracy. Precis Eng 24(2):99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmitz T, Davies M, Dutterer B, Ziegert J (2001) The application of high-speed CNC machining to prototype production. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(8):1209–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwenke H, Franke M, Hannaford J, Kunzmann H (2005) Error mapping of CMMs and machine tools by a single tracking interferometer. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 54(1):475–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shu Q, Zhu M, Liu X, Cheng H (2017) Radial error motion measurement of ultraprecision axes of rotation with nanometer level precision. J Manuf Sci Eng 139(7):071017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith GT (2016) Machine tool metrology: an industrial handbook. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang C, Liotto G (2002) A laser non-contact measurement of static positioning and dynamic contouring accuracy of a CNC machine tool. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the measurement science conferenceGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang Z, Mastrogiacomo L, Franceschini F, Maropoulos P (2011) Experimental comparison of dynamic tracking performance of iGPS and laser tracker. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(1):205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yetai F, Ping S, Xiaohuai C, Qiangxian H, Liandong Y (2010) The analysis and complementarity of Abbe principle application limited in coordinate measurement. In: Paper presented at the proceedings of the world congress on engineeringGoogle Scholar
  33. Ziegert JC, Mize CD (1994) The laser ball bar: a new instrument for machine tool metrology. Precis Eng 16(4):259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, School of Mechanical EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations